Diane Francis: Unnecessary delays to Bill C-18 are causing harm

  • 📰 nationalpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 18 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 80%

Canada Headlines News

Canada Latest News,Canada Headlines

ICYMI - Diane Francis: Unnecessary delays to Bill C-18 are causing harm

The carnage to the news industry is global and is due to the fact that the world’s digital giants — notably Google and Meta — republish or link to articles that they earn advertising revenue from, but don’t spend money creating.Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the Financial Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

The Australians took on Google and Facebook and won. Their pioneering “News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code”the country’s publishers. Google and Meta have paid 30 media companies around AU$200 million in royalties for their content over the past year, preventing closures, layoffs and consolidations in the media industry.

Source: News Formal (newsformal.com)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Kudos to Diane Francis for making it this far in life despite being vapid, boot licking whore.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in CA

Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Diane Francis: Unnecessary delays to Bill C-18 are causing harmBill C\u002D18 is being slowed down by those who want it to finance tiny, often questionable startups, writes Diane Francis. Read more. Canadian media is screwed... Canadians have woke up and realized it's propaganda... fix that. I pray the tech giants exit Canada and remove every stinking legacy mainstream media from their platforms leaving only independents on. They are easy to filter out, just look at the ones receiving Trudeau's media bribe. lost guns in the river?
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »

Diane Francis: Unnecessary delays to Bill C-18 are causing harmBill C\u002D18 is being slowed down by those who want it to finance tiny, often questionable startups, writes Diane Francis. Read more. Diane Francis doesn't get it as she is government & platform funded. Good for her. Pull up the ladder LOL. The delays are because the bills need to be amended. They really need to be completely re-written. Government control of the media is bad. c11 c18
Source: financialpost - 🏆 7. / 85 Read more »

How to fix the Senate's procedure and practiceParliamentary procedure and practice are of course intended to ensure a fair and orderly transaction of Senate business. But well-designed procedural rules and practices can also increase Senators’ effectiveness and efficiency. In this column, I’ll offer a few suggestions for modernizing the Senate’s procedure and practice. The second reading stage of a bill is traditionally the first chance for Senators to discuss the bill. It is the stage where a legislative body decides whether the principle or purpose of the bill merits a thorough clause-by-clause consideration with the possibility of improving it through amendments. That stage makes sense when the House is considering a government or a private member’s bill. The minister or private member sponsoring the bill must convince the Commons that the bill warrants further study instead of immediate rejection. But if the Senate’s mission is to act as a House of legislative revision instead of as a little duplicate of the House, it would never think of rejecting a government bill before sending it to committee for detailed examination and possible amendment. I suggest that it would waste less of the Senate’s time if a government bill received from the House were sent directly to committee for detailed examination without a second reading debate. Senate committees are already celebrated for their thorough study of bills referred to them. Committee study should be the Senate’s first step in examining government bills and not the second step as it is now. The only bills from the House that Senators should want to scrutinize carefully before authorizing a more detailed committee study are private members’ bills. Even after adoption by the House of Commons, private members’ bills may not be supported by the government and thus not be taken into consideration by voters at the next election. Moreover, private members’ bills are not given the same degree of scrutiny by the Commons as government bills are. Why does a government b
Source: TheHillTimes - 🏆 11. / 79 Read more »

UFC on ESPN 42 Highlight Video: Francis Marshall Flattens Marcelo RojoFrancis Marshall won his UFC debut in style as he flattened Marcelo Rojo with a gorgeous knockout.
Source: sherdogdotcom - 🏆 66. / 51 Read more »

'Hands off the Greenbelt’ rallies in OntarioProtestors all across the province demanded to repeal Bill 23, saying the housing bill would destroy the Greenbelt. Your elected Politicians behind those teflon smiles and fancy sounding words can be an evil person. Willfully destroying this green belt when the clowns (politicians)said they would not is evilness. Too many people too much development the major world problem. Few understand Yes, fordnation has someone's backs, not OURS, however... Translation bunch of professional useless people complaining again.
Source: CTVToronto - 🏆 9. / 84 Read more »

Alberta changing sovereignty bill to reverse provision giving cabinet unchecked powerSmith told a radio talk show Saturday that her sovereignty bill was never supposed to give cabinet such sweeping authority, and says her government wants to… CONs: Trudeau is a undemocratic dictator CON Smith's Alberta Sovereignty (provincial cabinet gets unilateral powers to change laws). CON Ford's Strong Mayors Act (gives city mayors the right to overrule majority of city councilors vote). Hey CONs, square this for me. The charter of rights isn't worth the paper it's printed on. The “notwithstanding clause” renders the charter useless as rights are not absolute and can be trampled at the whim of any provincial government along with your feds (see Quebec). Notwithstanding is the way to win.
Source: OttawaCitizen - 🏆 21. / 68 Read more »