“I can confirm that the Crown will be seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada,” said Jenessa Crognali. “It would be inappropriate to comment further as the matters are before the court.”Crognali said the notice of leave to appeal had yet to be filed.
Evidence was that both became psychotic and went on a violent rampage. Their defence, however, ran afoul of the ban on arguing self-induced extreme intoxication had resulted in their “automatism.” While such cases are rare and successfully raising an intoxication defence would be difficult, critics argued it had undermined a measure aimed at protecting women from sexual violence.“We are dismayed that women’s rights to equality and dignity are not given more adequate treatment,” the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund said of the ruling.
Good, the ruling did seem on the insane side
They only see the aggressor and whats been done. Not how it led to that moment. The government can only do so much with addictions services. Its up to you to take the initiative. Good men mean well, we just don't up doin well. 'Flies away''
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Crown wants to fight controversial 'extreme intoxication' defence rulingCanada's highest court will be asked to weigh in on a ruling that reopened the door for people accused of violent crimes to argue they were so intoxicated they had lost control of what they were doing. We are accountable for our actions intoxicated or not and the appropriate justice must handed out. I would hope so
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Crown wants to fight controversial ‘extreme intoxication’ defence rulingThe civil liberties groups say concerns the court had reopened floodgates for men accused of violence to argue intoxication was unwarranted Good, I was flabberghasted when it came out Good. That ruling was stupid. Yes!!! Bloody hell, yes!!!
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »
Crown Hoping To Challenge 'Intoxication' Defence Ruling In Supreme CourtA ruling by the Ontario Court of Appeal allows people accused of violent crimes to argue they were too intoxicated to control their actions. I'd like you issue a correction. The change did not anger 'some women.' I am also angry. Name each of the justices and print their picture in the paper. They deserve to face the thousands impacted by such stupid decision. They are cowards otherwise! Absolute BS we shouldn't have to accept this.
Source: HuffPostCanada - 🏆 61. / 53 Read more »
Crown wants to fight controversial 'extreme intoxication' defence rulingCanada's highest court will be asked to weigh in on a ruling that reopened the door for people accused of violent crimes to argue they were so intoxicated they had lost control of what they were doing. We are accountable for our actions intoxicated or not and the appropriate justice must handed out. I would hope so
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Crown wants to fight controversial ‘extreme intoxication’ defence rulingThe civil liberties groups say concerns the court had reopened floodgates for men accused of violence to argue intoxication was unwarranted Good, I was flabberghasted when it came out Good. That ruling was stupid. Yes!!! Bloody hell, yes!!!
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »
Crown Hoping To Challenge 'Intoxication' Defence Ruling In Supreme CourtA ruling by the Ontario Court of Appeal allows people accused of violent crimes to argue they were too intoxicated to control their actions. I'd like you issue a correction. The change did not anger 'some women.' I am also angry. Name each of the justices and print their picture in the paper. They deserve to face the thousands impacted by such stupid decision. They are cowards otherwise! Absolute BS we shouldn't have to accept this.
Source: HuffPostCanada - 🏆 61. / 53 Read more »