Robo-advisers – online investment management firms that use simple algorithms to place investors into suitable portfolios – have grown in popularity, at least in part, because of low-cost index funds. Evidence suggests that low-cost index funds tend to beat most active fund managers, and robo-advisers tend to use them extensively on that basis.
This means that for the “growth” asset allocation profile – a profile indicating medium-high risk – robo-advisers have delivered materially different returns to their customers. To gain an understanding of the dispersion in robo-adviser returns, I looked at the asset allocation approaches for a handful of Canadian robo-adviser Growth portfolios:
It has no doubt made these changes with good intentions, but its performance has suffered relative to a simple buy-and-hold indexing approach. The Globe finds that Wealthsimple’s returns are the lowest among Canadian robo-advisers.for the Questwealth portfolios are overt about their active management, which is intended to “limit losses” and look for “opportunities to improve your returns.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: globebusiness - 🏆 31. / 66 Read more »
Source: CP24 - 🏆 30. / 67 Read more »
Source: TSN_Sports - 🏆 80. / 51 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: macleans - 🏆 19. / 71 Read more »
Source: CBC - 🏆 32. / 63 Read more »