“What we’re going to show through the CERB is that we can actually have a really straightforward income-support system at the federal level,″ Qualtrough said in a telephone interview with The Canadian Press.
That’s a discussion her department has been having for some time, and the pandemic will fuel those talks, she said, but it’s a conversation that won’t be settled quickly. What we’re going to show through the CERB is that we can actually have a really straightforward income-support system at the federal level.With the benefit about to be introduced, the government warned Thursday of a text scam that may be praying on concerned workers by asking them to reply or click on a link to get the CERB, which isn’t officially available yet.
Trying to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus has forced governments to order businesses closed and companies to ask employees to work from home. The uncertainty has many small- and medium-sized businesses wondering if they’ll reopen once the economic storm has passed.An analysis published Thursday by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives estimated that nearly two million workers are at the greatest risk of being laid off by the end of the month.
Even for people on Disability?
The UK needs to look at this
Basic income
This isn’t free money. We’re looking at a $200 billion deficit. We couldn’t come close to saving a nickel during the good times, what makes you think we can sustain this?
Only if it is universal. CERB is far from universal. Many forced to work because they have not been impacted by Covid-19. Not yet anyhow! We need UniversalBasicIncome and we need it NOW!
CanadianPM I'm unemployed. $0. I don't have any income to qualify for whatever you're proposing. Please LIFT all restrictions. Just put money into people's account.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: macleans - 🏆 19. / 71 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »