These cases are all subtly different, and often criticisms come in bad faith from those looking to undermine climate action by painting climate leaders as hypocrites. After all, it’s reasonable to argue that when leaders are travelling to advance action on climate change, criticizing their mode of travel is a distraction.
. But dismissing outright the symbolism of leaders’ travel choices is a mistake, not least because transport emissions continue to rise.Article contentTo explore how personal action by leaders influences public perceptions, I have conducted focus groups as part of my PhD research. My preliminary results reveal that the public fully understand political leaders have tight schedules and their activities inevitably involve plenty of high-carbon activities such as air travel.
. The politician was roundly criticized in the focus groups because it showed he was “not willing to put his front foot forward and actually lead by example,” according to one participant. As with the G7 meeting, the fact that climate change was one of the primary reasons for the journey, and alternative travel was available, was deemed relevant and symbolic.Article content
So?
He lives on an island…
Stop with these stupid headlines. He’s the leader of a G7 nation. His time is important
So what?
The NP has become even more reliant on sensationalism than the Sun.
Although not my favourite PM, he is a PM and so flying, even if for one hour, is what they do. When campaigning, they fly all over the damn place.
And? An hour flight is a 12 hour train ride or 8 hour car ride. He travelled the same distance as Toronto is from New York City.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »