A new ordinance in Fremont, California, prohibits camping and storing belongings on public and private property. The law also criminalizes aiding and abetting those violating the ordinance, sparking fears among advocates that helping the homeless could lead to prosecution. While officials insist they won't target individuals providing food or clothing, critics argue the ordinance will deter aid and have a chilling effect on local organizations.
Unhoused resident José Arroyo talks during an interview at the homeless encampment near the corner of Osgood Road and Washington Boulevard in Fremont on Feb. 7, 2025. The aiding-and-abetting language has raised fears among advocates for homeless people that anyone seeking to help those living in encampments could soon have a target on their backs.
They say it’s one of the toughest anti-camping ordinances anywhere in the country. The penalty for violating the ordinance: a fine of up to $1,000 and up to six months in jail. It takes effect in just under 30 days. In the face of the controversy, the City Council, at the urging of many local residents, pushed ahead to approve the ban Tuesday. But officials emphasized they have no intention of arresting anyone offering homeless people food, clothing or other aid, and promised to continue collaborating with the city’s homeless service providers to alleviate the crisis. “Let’s continue to work together so we can help our unhoused individuals,” Fremont Mayor Raj Salwan said at Tuesday’s council meeting. That hasn’t assuaged advocates, who’ve accused the council of trying to push out the city’s homeless population. They worry the ordinance will have a “chilling effect” on local nonprofits and community groups and deter the city’s roughly 600 residents living on the streets from accepting needed services. “In one fell swoop, this ordinance has the ability to erase any progress we’ve made with ,” said Vivian Wan, chief executive of Abode Services, the city’s primary service provider.prohibits camping on any “street, sidewalk, park, open space, waterway, or banks of a waterway, or any private property not designated and equipped for such camping.” It also makes it a crime to “store personal property, including camp paraphernalia,” on all public property and private property without the owner’s permission. Additionally, the law establishes that anyone “permitting, aiding, abetting or concealing a violation” of the ordinance “shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.”Before the City Council voted to adopt the ban Tuesday, City Attorney Rafael Alvarado explained to councilmembers that since the ordinance only applies to camping and storing belongings, someone would only be charged with aiding and abetting for helping to further those specific acts. “As written, the city would not enforce this ordinance on someone that is handing another person food or clothing,” Alvarado said. In practice, city officials said that means authorities would likely only seek to prosecute someone found erecting makeshift dwellings or “David Bonaccorsi, an advocate, attorney and former Fremont city councilman, questioned whether anyone in the city was actually seeking to help homeless people build such structures. He also noted the ordinance’s definition of “camp paraphernalia” — which can’t be stored on public property — “includes, but is not limited to, bedrolls, tarpaulins, cots, beds, sleeping bags, hammocks or cooking facilities and similar equipment.” Bonaccorsi said that despite what officials say publicly, that means under the letter of the law, offering a homeless person a camping stove or bedding to keep warm at night could now also be considered a crime.Tristia Bauman, an attorney with the Silicon Valley Law Foundation, said that while the aiding-and-abetting rule is not unprecedented, it’s rare for cities to include such language in their no-camping ordinances. City officials note that Fremont already had language in its municipal code prohibiting the aiding and abetting of any criminal violation. They’ve maintained that the inclusion of the language in the ordinance itself was done only “in the interest of transparency.”In a letter to the City Council, the American Civil Liberties Union and other advocacy groups blasted the ordinance as “patently unreasonable,” adding the aiding-and-abetting rule “will expose the City to legal liability.” The ACLU described the rule as overly vague and argued California courts are not likely to enforce laws that “allow people to ‘indiscriminately be made the subject of prosecution,'” especially for misdemeanor offenses. Asked whether the ACLU plans to sue to halt the ban, the group said in a statement that it is “closely monitoring this ordinance and other measures that criminalize poverty across the state.” It’s still unclear if other organizations could be planning a legal challenge.Dear Abby: Maybe I overreacted in defending my new ladyAsking Eric: Mary suddenly has a thick beard. Should I keep pretending I don't notice?Asking Eric: I said I needed a break from her, and she got defensiveFatal Piedmont Cybertruck crash involved alcohol and cocaine, autopsies sayThis alien-like field of mirrors in the California desert was once the future of solar energy. It’s closing after just 11 years This alien-like field of mirrors in the California desert was once the future of solar energy. It’s closing after just 11 years
HOMELESSNESS ORDINANCE AIDING AND ABETTING FREMONT CALIFORNIA
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Fremont Celebrates New Fire Truck and Staffing Amidst Wildfire ConcernsFremont, California celebrated the addition of a new fire truck and firefighters to its department, a victory amidst budget cuts affecting many cities. The move comes as wildfire concerns escalate, prompting calls for increased disaster preparedness and investment in preventative measures. Rep. Eric Swalwell introduced a bill to bolster FEMA's resources for disaster prevention and response, while Fremont implements its own proactive strategies to mitigate wildfire risk.
Read more »
Fremont Considers Ban on Camping and Storing Personal Property on Public LandFremont, California, is considering a new ordinance that would ban camping and storing personal property on public land, aiming to address the growing homeless population. The proposed ban, which could be voted on as early as February 4th, has sparked debate among residents. While some support the measure, others argue that the city lacks sufficient resources to effectively address homelessness. The ordinance would authorize law enforcement to clear encampments and impose fines for violations.
Read more »
Fremont to vote on banning homeless camping in public spacesFremont's City Council on Tuesday is set to vote on an ordinance that would make it unlawful for any person to camp on any public property including any street, sidewalk, park, open space, or waterway.
Read more »
Fremont Camping Ban Sparks Debate and Concerns for Outreach WorkersA proposed ordinance in Fremont, California, aims to ban camping and encampments on public property, raising concerns among outreach workers who fear it could hinder their efforts to assist unhoused individuals.
Read more »
Fremont Bans Public Camping, Sparks Debate Over Criminalization of HomelessnessFremont, California, has adopted an ordinance prohibiting camping on all public property, allowing for criminal charges against those aiding or abetting homeless encampments. The measure, which takes effect in 30 days, has drawn fierce criticism from homeless advocates and service providers who argue it will deter assistance and criminalize those experiencing homelessness. Fremont officials maintain the goal is to change behavior and not to arrest homeless individuals or service providers.
Read more »
Did this Bay Area city make it a crime to help homeless people?Fremont has gained national attention for its strict new camping ban.
Read more »