For more than three hours, two experts offered opposing testimony about the benefit created for Tesla by a Delaware judge’s January ruling that rescinded Musk’s $56-billion pay package.
Legal teams for Tesla and a shareholder clashed in court on Monday over the value of a lawsuit that successfully challenged CEO Elon Musk ’s enormous pay package and a request for the company to
Daniel Fischel, a University of Chicago law professor, countered that there was no cost in cash to Tesla if Musk exercised the grant of stock options.Eric Crossan via Wikipedia
Tech Delaware Elon Musk Lawsuits Salaries Shareholders Tesla
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Tesla shareholders re-approve Elon Musk’s 2018 pay package, Musk saysInvestors and Musk’s supporters, including X CEO Linda Yaccarino, applauded the results. The tally will be finalized at a shareholder meeting later Thursday.
Read more »
Tesla renews legal fight to reinstate Elon Musk's $56B pay package after shareholders back dealTesla launched a fresh bid to secure legal reinstatement of Elon Musk’s controversial $56 billion pay package on Monday – days after the company’s shareholders voted to ratify the record-setting ag…
Read more »
Legal expert explains how Elon Musk can get a 25% stake in TeslaLegal expert explains how Elon Musk can get a 25% stake in Tesla
Read more »
Judge Overseeing Elon Musk’s Crusade Against Media Matters Owns Tesla StockMMFA is arguing that Reed O'Connor, conservative district judge in Texas, may have a conflict of interest in Elon Musk's crusade against them.
Read more »
Elon Musk: Tesla’s 4680 Batteries At Cost Parity With Cheapest Suppliers’ By End Of YearClean Tech News & Views: EVs, Solar Energy, Batteries
Read more »
Dozens of Tesla Cybertrucks vandalized by someone who really doesn’t like Elon MuskDozens of Tesla Cybertrucks in a Florida parking lot were defaced with a crude message about Elon Musk last week. The message was eventually removed.
Read more »