The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to take up a pair of court fights involving public officials who block their critics on social media.
While the Supreme Court left unanswered in 2021 the question of whether the First Amendment prohibits public officials from blocking critics, it will now have a chance to clarify how government officials can interact with constituents when it hears the cases involving local officials from Southern California and Michigan who blocked voters from their Facebook and Twitter pages.
After receiving repeated comments on their Facebook posts and tweets from Christopher and Kimberly Garnier, whose children attend school in the Poway Unified School District, O'Connor-Ratcliff and Zane blocked the two from their social media accounts. A federal district court allowed the lawsuit to proceed and, after a two-day trial, found O'Connor-Ratcliff and Zane violated the Garniers' First Amendment rights. The U.S.
In March 2020, Port Huron resident Kevin Lindke commented on Freed's page from three different profiles criticizing the city's response to the pandemic, including on a photo that Freed shared of the mayor ordering takeout from a local restaurant.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme court declines oil companies' request to shift climate suits to federal courtThe U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear arguments from oil companies on why a...
Read more »
Family, feds reach $5M settlement in fatal 2017 shooting of unarmed motorist in VirginiaThe family of a northern Virginia man fatally shot by U.S. Park Police officers has reached a $5 million settlement in its civil lawsuit against the government.
Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court to decide if public officials can block critics on social mediaThe U.S. Supreme Court, exploring free speech rights in the social media era, on Monday agreed to consider whether the Constitution's First Amendment bars government officials from blocking their critics on platforms like Facebook and Twitter.
Read more »
Supreme Court will decide if government officials can block social media critics | EngadgetThe Supreme Court will hear two cases that will determine if government officials can block critics on social networks..
Read more »
Supreme Court could decide if government officials can block social media usersDoes the First Amendment let them block?
Read more »
Supreme Court justices ‘at each other’s throats’ as abortion pill access upheld legal expert saysThe Supreme Court blocked in full a decision by Texas-based U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk made on April 7 that invalidated the Food and Drug Administration’s longtime approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito publicly dissented from the decision. Joy Reid and her panel discuss.
Read more »