Supreme Court Greenlights South Carolina's Gerrymandered Maps, Undermining Black Voters' Voices

United States News News

Supreme Court Greenlights South Carolina's Gerrymandered Maps, Undermining Black Voters' Voices
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 commondreams
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 18 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 51%

Newswire Editor is a Common Dreams staff position.

Today, in a controversial 6-3 decision, the right-wing majority of the U.S. Supreme Court allowed South Carolina Republicans to proceed with a gerrymandered map that weakens the influence of Black voters in the halls of Congress.This ruling reverses a lower court decision that determined the electoral maps were racially gerrymandered and ordered the state legislature to redraw its congressional districts.

Their ruling undermines the ability of Black voters to elect representatives who truly represent their interests and sets a dangerous precedent for racial gerrymandering nationwide. “Alexander v. South Carolina NAACP is a stark reminder of how vulnerable federal voting protections are for communities of color in the face of this Supreme Court.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

commondreams /  🏆 530. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Colorado Supreme Court greenlights signature collection for ballot initiative opponents believe would target LGBTQ+ studentsColorado Supreme Court greenlights signature collection for ballot initiative opponents believe would target LGBTQ+ studentsSupporters of the initiative have until August to collect about 125,000 signatures to get the measure on the ballot.
Read more »

Supreme Court finds no bias against Black voters in a South Carolina congressional districtSupreme Court finds no bias against Black voters in a South Carolina congressional districtThe case differed from one in Alabama in which the court ruled last year that Republican lawmakers diluted Black voters' political power.
Read more »

US Supreme Court says South Carolina election map doesn't impermissibly exclude Black votersUS Supreme Court says South Carolina election map doesn't impermissibly exclude Black votersThe conservative majority ruled the GOP-drawn map was not racial gerrymandering.
Read more »

Supreme Court rules in South Carolina gerrymandering caseSupreme Court rules in South Carolina gerrymandering caseThe U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 vote along ideological lines, reversed a lower court decision that had struck down a South Carolina congressional district as a racial gerrymander.
Read more »

Supreme Court Justice Alito pens South Carolina gerrymandering rulingSupreme Court Justice Alito pens South Carolina gerrymandering rulingJordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,' a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined MSNBC, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.
Read more »

Supreme Court allows disputed South Carolina voting map that critics say excludes Black votersSupreme Court allows disputed South Carolina voting map that critics say excludes Black votersState lawmakers who approved the map said the changes were driven by political party, not race.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-26 09:55:46