The Supreme Court will consider whether a U.S. border-patrol agent can be held liable in a cross-border shooting death
WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to consider whether U.S. border-patrol agents can be held liable for damages for shooting people on the Mexico side of the border.
The justices said they would hear a case on the 2010 cross-border shooting death of a 15-year-old Mexican boy who was playing in a cement culvert that separates El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. The teenager and his friends allegedly were playing a game where they would run up the concrete embankment and touch a fence in U.S. territory.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Israelis protest moves to grant Netanyahu immunity, limit Supreme CourtThousands of Israelis protested on Saturday against legislative steps that could...
Read more »
Israelis protest moves to grant Netanyahu immunity, limit Supreme CourtThe demonstration in Tel Aviv was attended by nearly all opposition parties, a rare show of unity for Israel's splintered political system.
Read more »
Israelis protest moves to grant Netanyahu immunity, limit Supreme CourtThousands of Israelis protest against legislative steps that could grant Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu immunity from prosecution and limit the power of the country's Supreme Court
Read more »
Supreme Court temporarily blocks rulings requiring new voting maps for Ohio and MichiganJUST IN: US Supreme Court temporarily blocks rulings requiring new voting maps for Ohio and Michigan; lower court rulings had invalidated the maps as partisan gerrymanders.
Read more »
Supreme Court blocks rulings requiring new U.S. House maps for Ohio, MichiganThe Supreme Court has blocked lower court rulings that invalidated, as partisan gerrymanders, Ohio’s map for congressional districts and Michigan’s maps for congressional and state legislative districts. NBC News' Pete Williams reports.
Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court blocks redrawing of Ohio, Michigan electoral mapsThe justices granted requests from Republican lawmakers in both states to stay those decisions. The lower courts found that the electoral maps had been drawn to entrench the majority party in power, a practice known as partisan gerrymandering, in violation of the U.S. Constitution. While both disputes
Read more »
Supreme Court blocks gerrymandering rulings in Michigan and OhioThe Supreme Court set aside two lower court rulings tossing out congressional maps in Michigan and Ohio, putting the process of redrawing district lines on hold while it prepares to rule on whether partisan gerrymandering is constitutional
Read more »
Supreme Court halts gerrymandering cases in Ohio and MichiganThe Supreme Court has agreed to put on hold partisan gerrymandering cases from Ohio and Michigan, temporarily sparing Republican lawmakers in those states of the need to redraw congressional districts by the summer.
Read more »
Supreme Court puts on hold gerrymandering rulings in Michigan, OhioThe Supreme Court agreed on Friday to put on hold lower court rulings that ordered new voting maps in Michigan and Ohio.
Read more »
Supreme Court grants Ohio, Michigan requests to delay new maps in gerrymandering casesThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Ohio and Michigan do not need to draw new congressional maps right now, a blow for Democrats who have long railed against the lines that kept their party from being competitive.
Read more »