Personal Perspective: Asking “what should I do?” rarely motivates action. Change comes from reflecting on what you want and aligning decisions with the person you want to become.
Motivation to act comes from wanting to do something, not from external rules. When people hear that I’m an ethicist, they often present me with a scenario and ask, “What should I do?
” This is a mistake for two reasons. First, you don’t want me – or anyone else – to make decisions for you.
Second, you don’t actually want to be told what to do – even by yourself. What you really want is to be motivated to act based on what you truly care about. We tend to think that ethics, like law or medicine, can provide correct answers to difficult questions. An ethicist is, therefore, an expert who can come in, assess the situation, and tell us what is right or wrong, or good or bad.
This makes sense when you think about the ways we typically use specialists. Lawyers know the law and doctors know medicine. They ask our input, but we need their guidance on what we should do. Yet, if an ethicist walks into a room and says, “I know what you should do.
Just listen to me,” most of us would immediately resist. Unlike medicine or law, ethics is personal. It’s how we relate to each other and the world around us. By delegating ourto someone else, we give away our autonomy and agency as moral beings.
Moreover, when you ask the ethicist what to do, you risk the “moral specialist” imposing their own views, beliefs, and values onto you, rather than trying to see the world and your decision through your own eyes. Instead of applying objective moral rules, it would be more productive to think of ethics in the original way that philosophers thought of it: as a way to reflect on how we can live our best lives and how we can shape our communities to assist us in developing skills and perspectives to thrive or flourish.
We would then frame ethical decisions thinking about how life is composed, not only of our actions, but also by our intentions and motivations, the consequences of our actions, and how our actions become habits that shape our sense ofEven when we say to ourselves, “you should do this,” it typically feels like we are imposing some external pressure on ourselves. Coercion often leads to reactance , even when we are"forcing" ourselves.
So, why would we ever want to frame our decisions in ways that make it more difficult to follow through? This is not to say that we do whatever we want at first blush. Rather, it means that it would be better motivationally speaking – let alone being more aligned with ourand values – to frame the question of what to do based on our own desire to live up to the people we aspire to be.
Therefore, when someone asks me, “What should I do? ” I take them through a four-question process. My immediate response is, “? ” This could seem paradoxical, since they asked me for advice, but “should” and “want” are very different starting points.
Asking them what they want to do is the first step of self-reflection. It gives a chance to explore their strongest or most immediate motivations.? ” This is not to get them to say what I want to hear. It asks them to consider why they are conflicted.
People oftentimes want to react in a certain way” Here, the question turns moral decision-making from being compliance-oriented to being about self-identity. It allows us to see our choices as expressions of who we are and want to be. It asks us to show what we prioritize through the choices that we make. Does your decision reflect the person you want to be?
” This question makes sure that we don’t choose only based on how we currently see ourselves; we also choose based on how we want to see ourselves. These questions turn our moral challenges – and life in general – from being isolated moments to part of a larger process of becoming. Together, they allow us to see how choices we make reinforce a pattern, shape habits, and contribute to our identity over time.
“What should I do? ” sounds like the right question, but it assumes that there is a right answer that works for everyone and once we know it, we will act accordingly. It also frames our decisions as fulfilling obligations.
“What do I want? ” and “Who do I want to be? ” are harder questions to work through, since the answer isn’t the same for everyone. We can’t just follow someone else.
We need to self-reflect and lead our own lives. Moreover, two people can look at the same situation and make different decisions. This doesn’t mean that everything is relative. It means that even when people share similar values, they may nevertheless prioritize them differently.
Ethics is not just about knowing the right decision. It is about learning how to live in a way that reflects what we value most.
“What should I do? ” may give you an answer.
“What do I care about? ” gives you a reason to act. In the end, it is doing what we want to do that changes how we live. , is an associate professor at the Emory University School of Medicine and the executive director of the Emory Purpose Project.
Self Tests are all about you. Are you outgoing or introverted? Are you a narcissist? Does perfectionism hold you back?
Find out the answers to these questions and more with Psychology Today.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Runners celebrate community spirit and personal victories at IBX Broad Street RunThousands of runners filled the Navy Yard with cheers, exhaustion and pride on Sunday as they crossed the finish line of the 47th annual Independence Blue Cross Broad Street Run.
Read more »
The Insanity Theory of Kamala HarrisPerspective: With 2028 looming, Democrats are eyeing potential candidates for president. And Harris is making moves.
Read more »
VIDEO: Stefon Diggs’ Assault Accuser Claims They Had a Sexual Relationship Before Becoming His Personal ChefSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Read more »
Tech regulation gets personal: How Tom Steyer’s brother could shape California’s AI futureCalMatters is a nonpartisan and nonprofit news organization dedicated to serving the state of California.
Read more »
Geno Auriemma Backs Paige Bueckers and Azzi Fudd on 'Personal Matter'UConn Huskies coach Geno Auriemma was asked about Azzi Fudd and Paige Bueckers' relationship.
Read more »
The Unseen Current of Parenting: A Mother's Perspective on the Relentless Mental LoadA mother reflects on the constant, often invisible demands of parenting, from the small disruptions that require immediate attention to the persistent mental and emotional labor that shapes every aspect of her life. She explores how parenting is not just a second shift but a continuous current that flows beneath everything, affecting work, relationships, and even moments of respite.
Read more »