The most important stories for you to know today
A courtroom brawl between two of the tech industry's most powerful leaders, Tesla CEO Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, is underway in Oakland, California, in a case that could transform one of the world's most important artificial intelligence companies.
: In his lawsuit, Musk has argued that Altman steered the company they cofounded a decade ago, ChatGPT creator OpenAI, away from its original mission as a nonprofit meant to develop advanced AI for the benefit of humanity and free of profit motives. The case hinges on a decision early on by OpenAI's founders that they needed to create a for-profit entity to tap capital markets for funding on a scale necessary to build advanced AI.
Musk's lawyers are set to argue that Altman and others enriched themselves illegally through that for-profit conversion. When discussions about who would run the for-profit business broke down in 2018, Musk left. OpenAI has said Musk was involved in the discussions about converting part of the company to a nonprofit, and that in 2017,"We and Elon agreed that a for-profit was the next step for OpenAI to advance the mission.
" OpenAI has also "Ladies and gentlemen, we are here today because the defendants in this case stole a charity," Steve Molo, an attorney for Musk, said in his opening statement.
In his lawsuit, Musk has argued that Altman steered the company they cofounded a decade ago, ChatGPT creator OpenAI, away from its original mission as a nonprofit meant to develop advanced AI for the benefit of humanity and free of profit motives. The case hinges on a decision early on by OpenAI's founders that they needed to create a for-profit entity to tap capital markets for funding on a scale necessary to build advanced AI.
When discussions about who would run the for-profit business broke down in 2018, Musk left. The following year, OpenAI launched a for-profit division, which has since ballooned in value; at the end of March, the company said it Now, Musk's lawyers are set to argue that Altman and others enriched themselves illegally through that for-profit conversion.
"They enriched themselves, they made themselves more powerful, and they breached the very basic principles on which the charity was founded," Molo said in court. According to his suit, Musk is seeking a rollback of that change, and wants Altman, OpenAI President Greg Brockman and financial backer Microsoft to"disgorge" tens of billions of dollars in"ill-gotten gains" that have flowed from it.
Musk is also seeking Altman's ouster as a director of OpenAI's nonprofit board, and removal of both Altman and Brockman as officers of the for-profit company. As part of his opening statement, Molo asked Musk to stand up, which he did — waving to the people in the courtroom.
"Everybody seems to know Mr. Musk and everybody seems to have an opinion about Mr. Musk," Molo said. But he reminded the jury that they took an oath to put their opinions aside, and thanked them for it.
"The case isn't about Mr. Musk, it's about the defendants," he said. He also filled the jury in on Musk's personal and business history; growing up in South Africa, immigrating to Canada and the United States, and giving a brief overview of Musk's companies including SpaceX, Tesla, and Neuralink.
Molo said that since college Musk has been concerned about what could happen when computers become smarter than people, and that over the course of the trial, his attorneys would call experts to testify about some of those risks, including the possibility that an AI could manipulate financial markets or disseminate misinformation, or that there could be a"concentration risk" caused by one powerful corporation or small group of people controlling a superpowerful AI.
"As AI became more advanced, Elon became more worried," Molo said, particularly about the idea that the government was not doing enough to curtail these risks. That led him to develop OpenAI along with Altman, Molo said, as a nonprofit intended to develop safer AI.
"It wasn't a vehicle for people to get rich," Molo said. "And they wanted the technology to be open. " Musk poured about $38 million into the nonprofit over the course of about 5 years, Molo said. "Without Elon Musk there would be no OpenAI, pure and simple," he said.
Over time, Molo said, Musk and OpenAI's other leaders began discussing creating a for-profit entity to support the non-profit — he compared it to the way a museum store supports a museum. Initially, Molo said, Musk would have majority control of the for-profit subsidiary, but eventually that would be diminished over time. But the partners could never come to an agreement, and Musk ended negotiations and later resigned from the OpenAI board..
At this point, Molo said, OpenAI"was no longer operating for the good of humanity as a whole. It was for profit operating for the good of the defendants.
"OpenAI has said Musk was involved in the discussions about converting part of the company to a nonprofit, and that in 2017,"We and Elon agreed that a for-profit was the next step for OpenAI to advance the mission. "The company has framed the dispute as being more of a struggle over control than over the launch of a for-profit arm: Online, OpenAI hasthat Musk wanted control of the for-profit company, but"we couldn't agree to terms on a for-profit with Elon because we felt it was against the mission for any individual to have absolute control over OpenAI.
" "We're sad that it's come to this with someone whom we've deeply admired—someone who inspired us to aim higher, then told us we would fail, started a competitor, and then sued us when we started making meaningful progress towards OpenAI's mission without him," the OpenAI statement said. And in court on Tuesday, OpenAI's lead counsel William Savitt hammered those points in his opening statement.
"We're here because Mr. Musk didn't get his way at OpenAI," he said. And"because he's a competitor, he will do anything he can to attack OpenAI.
" In 2017, he said, Musk wanted to turn OpenAI into a for-profit with himself at the helm. But, he said,"the other founders refused to turn the keys of artificial intelligence over to one person.
" Musk sought to merge OpenAI with Tesla, he continued, but the other founders rejected that, too. "They didn't want to be part of a car company that Musk controlled," Savitt said. "Most importantly," he continued,"One person having control wasn't consistent with OpenAI's mission. " After Musk left, Savitt said, Musk was furious that OpenAI succeeded without him:"Then he launched his own competitor.
Then he launched lawsuits.
" Savitt said that during the trial, OpenAI's attorneys will produce evidence to show that the OpenAI nonprofit foundation remains in control of the organization and that it's doing good work. And they will argue that Musk's true interest in this suit is not OpenAI's nonprofit status.
"What he cares about is Elon Musk being at the top," Savitt said. In addition to Musk, Altman is expected to testify, along with Brockman, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, and several key researchers and engineers involved in OpenAI's launch.explores the weird and secret bits of SoCal that would excite even the most jaded Angelenos. He also covers mental health.
Keep an eye out as you move about Los Angeles this week, there’s a good chance you might catch a 40-foot, traveling work of art. Here’s where you might encounter it and what it means. Using house paint and other materials, Wilmington-raised artist Edgar Ramirez has emblazoned a shipping container with the words “I want to be free” in hues of green and red.
Ramirez said the language of his piece, “I Want To Be Free ,” is a response to a collective fear he senses in our region, whether it’s from ongoing ICE raids or economic hardship.
“It’s like this constant struggle of just trying to make it, you know? And there’s a lot of that throughout Los Angeles," Ramirez told LAist.
"And I think it’s something that a lot of us feel together. But we don’t really talk about it as much as I think we should be.
"Ramirez is on the road now through Friday with his piece, making stops from Burbank all the way to Long Beach, with a public event at Plaza de la Raza on May 1 to coincide with May Day.to first lady Melania Trump's call for ABC to"take a stand" against him for a joke he made about her ahead of the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner. Two days after Kimmel's original segment aired, authorities subdued a heavily armed man who they say entered the event at the Washington Hilton ballroom in an attempt to target administration officials.on Thursday, the comedian delivered a mock White House Correspondents' Dinner roast.
"Look at Melania, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow," Kimmel quipped. In aOn Monday, Kimmel told his audience, it"obviously was a joke about their age difference, and the look of joy we see on her face every time they're together.
" He said it was a"light roast" and was"not, by any stretch of the definition, a call to assassination. And they know that.
" Kimmel added that he's been very vocal for many years against gun violence.to first lady Melania Trump's call for ABC to"take a stand" against him for a joke he made about her ahead of the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner. Two days after Kimmel's original segment aired, authorities subdued a heavily armed man who they say entered the event at the Washington Hilton ballroom in an attempt to target administration officials.on Thursday, the comedian delivered a mock White House Correspondents' Dinner roast.
"Look at Melania, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow," Kimmel quipped. On Monday, Kimmel told his audience, it"obviously was a joke about their age difference, and the look of joy we see on her face every time they're together.
" He said it was a"light roast" and was"not, by any stretch of the definition, a call to assassination. And they know that.
" Kimmel added that he's been very vocal for many years against gun violence. Melania Trump didn't see it that way.
"His monologue about my family isn't comedy- his words are corrosive and deepens the political sickness within America," she wrote on Twitter on Monday. "People like Kimmel shouldn't have the opportunity to enter our homes each evening to spread hate. " Mrs. Trump urged ABC, the network that airs Kimmel's weeknight show, to take action, asking"how many times will ABC's leadership enable Kimmel's atrocious behavior at the expense of our community?
"In September, Kimmel was taken off the air after a conservative backlash over comments Kimmel made in the aftermath of Turning Point USA co-founderThe FCC Chair Brendan Carr responded to the backlash by threatening ABC affiliates. "We can do this the easy way or the hard way," Carr said to podcaster Benny Johnson. "These companies can find ways to change conduct, to take action on Kimmel or, you know, there's going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.
"over free speech and censorship. Kimmel's show returned six days later, and the host said,"it was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man.
" Kimmel accepted why some people were upset with his remarks and said they had been"ill-timed,or unclear or maybe both. " Meanwhile, users on X have been responding to Melania Trump's post. Some appear to be supportive. Others point to the president's history of strongly worded, disparaging and racist remarks in posts about women and his political detractors such asIf you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report.
Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less. The city of Los Angeles will soon roll out an infrastructure plan to address chronic issues like potholes and broken streetlights, Mayor Karen Bass told LAist’s. Bass said the plan will include a timeline and strategy to address those issues.
The plan is said to include installing 60,000 solar lights around the city, replacing copper wiring that has been the target of thieves. Larry Mantle at Loyola Marymount University and said so much of L.A. is out of date. When asked why L.A. persistently struggles to address these issues, Bass said it's the way the city was organized over the years.
"It's what I inherited, and it's what I've been tackling from Day 1 and plan to continue to do that because I find it to be woefully unacceptable," she said. Bass is running for a second term as mayor. Her incoming plan comes a week after one from Councilmember Nithya Raman, who is also running for L.A. mayor.
DuringHuntington Beach suffered another courtroom loss in its culture war battles this week when a judge ordered the city to pay $1 million in legal fees for restricting minors’ access to library books.in the public libraries. Critics said the policy amounted to illegal censorship, and that it was actually an excuse to restrict books with LGBTQ characters and themes.
In September 2025, Orange County Judge Lindsey Martinez found the policyThe city had also established a citizen review board with the power to censor children’s books at the library. VotersHuntington Beach suffered another courtroom loss in its culture war battles this week when a judge ordered the city to pay $1 million in legal fees for restricting minors’ access to library books.
The City Council passed a resolution in 2023 prohibiting children from accessing books deemed to contain sexual content in the city's public libraries. Critics said the policyThe city had also established a citizen review board with the power to censor children’s books at the library. Voters“The City Council continues to burn through taxpayer dollars to pursue their own personal grievances,” said Erin Spivey, the named plaintiff in the library lawsuit who is now running for City Council.
The city has received some pro bono legal counsel from the conservative law firm America First Legal, co-founded by Trump advisor Stephen Miller, including a The city has appealed Martinez’s decision and, in the meantime, has not taken many of the steps required in the judge’s order, according to library advocates. Those include returning a handful of censored books on puberty and the human body to the children’s section, and restoring the central library’s once-popular teen section.
In a statement to LAist, Mike Vigliotta, the city attorney, said officials were “evaluating next steps. ” He also noted that the judge’s award of $1 million was reduced from the $1.5 million initially requested by plaintiffs.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
AI showdown: Musk and Altman go to trial in fight over OpenAI's beginningsTechnology tycoons Elon Musk and Sam Altman are poised to face off in a high-stakes trial revolving around the alleged betrayal, deceit and unbridled ambition that blurred the bickering billionaires’ once-shared vision for the development of artificial intelligence.
Read more »
Elon Musk and San Altman head to trial in feud over future of OpenAIRegardless of the outcome, the two years the legal fight has been playing out and the three-week trial amount to a lengthy distraction for OpenAI and its staff at a time when it faces resurgent competition.
Read more »
Microsoft and OpenAI Revise Partnership, Ending Sales ExclusivityMicrosoft and OpenAI have amended their partnership, removing Microsoft's exclusive right to sell OpenAI's AI models. This allows OpenAI to collaborate with other cloud providers like Amazon, while Microsoft will no longer receive a revenue share on resold OpenAI products. The deal aims to simplify their relationship and enable both companies to pursue new opportunities.
Read more »
Elon Musk trial against Sam Altman to reveal OpenAI power struggleThe bitter legal fight between Elon Musk and the leading artificial intelligence firm, OpenAI, led by Sam Altman, may come down to a few pages in one executive's personal diary.
Read more »
Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman feud explained as OpenAI trial beginsMusk alleges that Altman violated OpenAI's founding principles by trying to turn the company into a “get-rich-quick scheme.“
Read more »
Elon Musk Arrives at OpenAI Trial in Cadillac, Sparks SpeculationElon Musk attended the opening of his high-stakes trial against Sam Altman and OpenAI in a Cadillac, raising questions about why he didn't use a Tesla. The trial revolves around Musk's claim that OpenAI abandoned its original nonprofit mission for profit, a claim OpenAI denies.
Read more »