EPA decision to tighten oversight of gene-edited crops draws mixed response

United States News News

EPA decision to tighten oversight of gene-edited crops draws mixed response
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 NewsfromScience
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 55 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 51%

The EPA will require evidence that introduced traits don’t increase health risks before exempting genetically modified plants from regulation.

When the CRISPR gene editor landed in U.S. plant science labs a decade ago, allowing researchers to tweak a crop’s own DNA instead of pasting in foreign genes, hopes rose that it would pave the way for looser regulation of genetically modified crops. Last year, the U.S. Department of Agriculture gave plant scientists much of their wish, exempting certain gene-edited changes to plants. But the Environmental Protection Agency is taking a tougher stance.

The move clarifies the regulatory requirements for industry and provides valuable oversight, says Jennifer Kuzma of North Carolina State University, an expert on biotechnology and public policy. But an industry group says the new rule will stifle innovation. For more than 20 years, all three bodies have reviewed crops engineered to contain DNA from other species, an appraisal process that can take years and cost industry millions of dollars in testing. The extent of agency oversight has been unclear for gene-edited crops, in which DNA is modified but not moved between species.. For example, researchers won’t need to ask for agency approval if they give a crop a trait that already exists naturally in a sexually compatible plant.

The agency says regulatory review will still be faster and cheaper for gene-edited crops compared with transgenic plants. But the American Seed Trade Association worries that researchers who use conventional breeding—and have not previously needed to ask EPA for a regulatory review—will be dissuaded from adopting gene editing.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

NewsfromScience /  🏆 515. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Lordstown's EV pickup has a worryingly short 174 miles of EPA range | EngadgetLordstown's EV pickup has a worryingly short 174 miles of EPA range | EngadgetThe EPA has rated Lordstown's Endurance electric pickup truck for just 174 miles of range, or well below Ford and Rivian..
Read more »

Fisker Ocean Achieves EPA-Estimated Range Of Up To 360 MilesFisker Ocean Achieves EPA-Estimated Range Of Up To 360 MilesFisker says Ocean deliveries in the US are expected to begin in June after the SUV received the EPA Certificate of Conformity and California Air Resources Board Executive Order.
Read more »

Lordstown Endurance pickup gets EPA-rated 174 miles of range - AutoblogLordstown Endurance pickup gets EPA-rated 174 miles of range - AutoblogThe EPA rates the Lordstown Endurance EV pickup as having a range of 174 miles and 48 MPGe combined, both terrible numbers.
Read more »

SCOTUS right to narrow the EPA’s powerSCOTUS right to narrow the EPA’s powerThe recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Sackett v. EPA, narrowing the federal government’s power to regulate wetlands, was a unanimous 9-0 decision. That may have surprised many Americans who have …
Read more »

Lordstown's Electric Truck Lacks Endurance, Gets Disappointing 174 Mile EPA Range | CarscoopsLordstown's Electric Truck Lacks Endurance, Gets Disappointing 174 Mile EPA Range | CarscoopsThe Lordstown Endurance EV has 174 miles of range, which is far less than earlier estimates of more than 250 miles car auto cars
Read more »

Supreme Court ruling makes waves for Biden’s EPASupreme Court ruling makes waves for Biden’s EPA'The Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. EPA is a major step in the right direction for common sense, states’ rights, and private property rights. It could provide a legal precedent for fighting other instances of the EPA’s overreach.' -Rachael Wilfong
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-03-07 01:04:02