which she ‘disagrees with fundamentally’, saying that setting aside the report may be interpreted as the court letting people implicated in the report off the hook.
But Segalwe did say that Mkhwebane was “astonished” by the ruling, given that, during arguments in October 2017, her counsel went to great lengths to make several issues regarding her investigation clear to the court. “She could not investigate issues that were in the public space such as the #GuptaLeaks because this office, in the State of Capture report, had already directed that a commission of inquiry be established to look into state capture claims. The suggestion being made is that she should have launched a parallel investigation to look into what her office had already deferred to the commission — a view she finds illogical…” Segwale said.
“When I met with these intended beneficiaries in Vrede almost two years ago, I undertook to fight this matter on all fronts. The DA laid the initial complaint with the Public Protector and, following the release of her report, we held the view that the report was a ‘whitewash’, as it failed to hold to account those responsible for the theft of almost R200-million of public money. Today, the Gauteng High Court has vindicated our view, as it held this report to be unconstitutional and invalid.
This one is just a waste of breath
We astonished you still there. Come pack your bags!! You’re embarrassing yourself
The ruling was expected because the judge is white and whites are racists.
Again Just pissing tax payers money away
Sorry PP, you are out of line. Accept it and move on out into 'unprotected ' space. Get real and cut the crap.
What is astonishing is her failings when it comes to a proper understanding of the Constitution, and of her job as PP.
She must step down maan cse ppl are waiting Vrede scandal yena uyanqaba uyadukisa
Cmon Cyril.... get rid of her
South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »
Source: IOL - 🏆 46. / 51 Read more »
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »