Court dismisses Mchunu’s bid to halt IPP operations at Clanwilliam Dam

  • 📰 TheCitizen_News
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 78 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 35%
  • Publisher: 75%

South Africa Headlines News

South Africa Latest News,South Africa Headlines

Judge rules the proceedings ‘were not properly authorised’.

A high court application by Minister of Water and Sanitation Senzo Mchunu to stop the operations of an independent power producer at Clanwilliam Dam has been dismissed with costs because of false testimony by the department’s chief director of engineering services.

Mchunu’s founding papers said this project requires the termination of the operations agreement with Clackson Power, which resulted in the DWS addressing correspondence to Clackson Power terminating the agreement effective from 28 February 2022. Clackson Power has a right to occupy the property and possess the land based on an agreement of servitude dated 31 March 1998, the contract of sale between it and the municipality dated 27 February 1998, the PPA dated 8 December 2011, and the operating agreement dated 17 April 2001;

Judge Joubert said “it is surprising, to say the least” that there was no attempt by Chaminuka in his replying affidavit to explain the false evidence given in his founding affidavit relating to his designation nor the purpose and effect of the general power of attorney and also no attempt at ratifying Chaminuka’s actions by an authorised official.

“It is accordingly neither necessary nor sensible to deal with the remaining issues raised in this case.”Judge Joubert said Chaminuka falsely testified that he is the Director-General of the DWS and, on that basis, alleged authority to institute the proceedings on Mchunu’s behalf. JSE-listed construction group Raubex lodged a high court application last year seeking an order compelling the DWS to provide reasons for the award of a tender for drilling and blasting for the Clanwilliam Dam foundation excavation and slope protection to a contractor whose bid price was a staggering R148.9 million more than its bid, the lowest and only other bid.

Source: Law Daily Report (


Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in ZA

South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Mchunu’s bid to stop IPP from operating at Clanwilliam Dam dismissedJudge rules the proceedings ‘were not properly authorised’ and it was therefore ‘neither necessary nor sensible to deal with the remaining issues’ in the case.
Source: Moneyweb - 🏆 5. / 77 Read more »

IPP contracts amended to sell to transmission companyNersa approvals brings unbundling closer.
Source: Moneyweb - 🏆 5. / 77 Read more »

Louis Rees-Zammit: R17 million NFL OffersFormer rugby star Louis Rees-Zammit attracts NFL interest, transitioning to American football through IPP.
Source: TheSAnews - 🏆 25. / 59 Read more »

Update: Alleged sangoma released and three abandon bail in Joshlin caseCourt proceedings in the Vredenburg Magistrate's Court were delayed for more than an hour on Wednesday morning due to angry confrontations outside the court.
Source: CapeTownEtc - 🏆 17. / 63 Read more »

Court rules in favour of farming network for SAPS to provide records of destroyed firearmsThe SAAI brought the matter before the court, after SAPS failed to provide evidence that the destroyed firearms were subjected to the Integrated Ballistic Identification System prior to being destroyed.
Source: ewnreporter - 🏆 35. / 51 Read more »

Johannesburg High Court dismisses application to interdict broadcastThe Johannesburg High Court has dismissed an urgent application by convicted murderer and rapist Thabo Bester and Dr Nandipha Magudumana to interdict the broadcast by Judge Stuart Wilson declined to order costs against the two in the case, pointing out that both were inmates. Speaking outside court, Magudumana’s attorney said they were dismayed by the outcome, but would ensure their client has the opportunity to state her case in a documentary. Bester and Magudumana failed to prove how the airing of the documentary would prejudice their right to a fair trial as the two are before the court. The co-accused argued their rights would be violated should MultiChoice’s Showmax broadcast the documentary. But the court dismissed the application. “There is accordingly no basis that I can recognize in law upon which the relief the applicants of sort can be granted the application must be dismissed,” says Judge Stuart Willson, High Court Judge. Multichoice opposed the application, citing freedom of expression
Source: SABC News Online - 🏆 32. / 51 Read more »