Animals, Wisconsin, Wolves

Animals, Wisconsin

Wisconsin Wolf Hunt Temporarily Blocked By Court

A judge sided with wildlife advocates who say a slated wolf hunting season would be unconstitutional.

10/23/2021 9:05:00 PM

A judge sided with wildlife advocates who say a slated wolf hunting season would be unconstitutional.

A judge sided with wildlife advocates who say a slated wolf hunting season would be unconstitutional.

10/23/2021 02:04pm EDTMADISON, Wis. (AP) — A judge on Friday halted Wisconsin’s fall wolf season two weeks before hunters were set to take to the woods, siding with wildlife advocacy groups who argued that holding the hunt would be unconstitutional.Dane County Circuit Judge Jacob Frost issued a temporary injunction halting the season, which was set to begin Nov. 6. The order comes as part of a lawsuit that a coalition of wildlife advocacy groups filed in August seeking to stop the hunt and invalidate a state law authorizing annual seasons.

Bus driver shortage hurts D.C. region’s ability to return to pre-pandemic transit service levels Jennifer Lopez reportedly feels Ben Affleck romance is 'truly meant to be' Guard fatally shot as TV news crew covers smash-and-grab theft in Oakland

AdvertisementAmong other things, the coalition argued that the season is illegal because the Department of Natural Resources hasn’t updated its regulations setting up season parameters and has been relying on an emergency rule put in place shortly after then-Gov. Scott Walker signed a law in 2012 authorizing annual seasons and a wolf management plan that hasn’t been updated since 2007.

Frost said the law creating the wolf season is constitutional on its face, but that the DNR failed to create permanent regulations enacting it. The law gives the DNR great leeway in setting kill limits, hunting zone hours and the number of licenses making it all the more important that the department following the regulatory process to ensure it doesn’t violate the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches, Frost said.

“I’m not overruling the wolf hunt law. In fact, I’m saying it has to be enforced as it was written and intended,” Frost said. “The DNR is currently not following the law or following the constitution. Its decisions are built on a faulty basis, meaning they can’t stand, either.”

This April 18, 2008, file photo provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife shows a gray wolf.AP Photo/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Gary KramerThe judge said the injunction will remain in place until the DNR implements updated regulations on determining quotas and the number of licenses it issues and updates its wolf management plan with new wolf population goals for the state.

AdvertisementHannah Jurss, an assistant attorney general representing the DNR in the case, asked Frost to stay his ruling pending appeal, calling his ruling “unquestionably a dramatic decision.” Frost refused, saying the DNR could still hold a season this year if it can move quickly on new regulations.

DNR spokeswoman Sarah Hoye said the agency would review the injunction and had no further comment.Hunters, farmers and conservationists have been sparring for years over how to handle wolves in Wisconsin. Farmers insist that the animals are destroying their crops and that killing them is the only way to control them. Conservationists and wildlife advocates insist the wolf population is too fragile to support hunting and that the animals are too beautiful to destroy.

Why the bond market has become jumpier The Swiss psychiatrist who inspired a viral TikTok hashtag USC rally comes up short in loss to No. 13 BYU that ends Trojans' bowl hopes

The state held fall wolf seasons in 2012, 2013 and 2014 before a federal judge placed the animal back on the endangered species list.AdvertisementThe Trump administration removed them from the list last year and the decision became final in January, triggering a hunting season in Wisconsin..

The DNR was preparing to launch a November season, but Kansas-based hunting group Hunter Nation won a court-order forcing the agency to hold a season in February. The group argued that the Biden administration could restore federal protections for wolves at any moment, robbing hunters of the chance to kill the animals.

The DNR scrambled to put together a season, setting the kill limit at 119 wolves. Hunters quickly blew past the limit, killing 218 wolves in just four days. The latest DNR estimates put the wolf population in Wisconsin at about 1,000. Read more: HuffPost »

American Music Awards 2021: The Full Winners List

The American Music Awards aired live from the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles tonight at 8 p.m. ET/PT on ABC. Hosted by Cardi B, the star-studded awards show featured performances from BTS with Co…

Thank God!! Wolves WolfAwarenessWeek Why do people want to hunt these things? They're just doing what they're supposed to do. Why would hunt these things? They're doing what they're supposed to do

Supreme Court grants expedited review for Texas abortion banThe Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on Texas' novel abortion ban but declined for a second time to temporarily halt the law as litigation proceeds over its constitutionality Essentially we have the power to do whatever we want…. Until Roe v Wade is no longer the law of the land one would think that the Texas ban is unconstitutional. 13 Circuit Courts should equal 13 SCOTUS's 🤷🏻‍♂️

looking for image editor,click the link bellow to get all kind of image editing service Are we surprised? Yet the are not political? Give me a break!

Alabama again prepares to execute man after Supreme Court blocked it earlier this yearAfter the Supreme Court blocked an Alabama man's execution in February, the state is again preparing to execute him by lethal injection Thursday evening despite his lawyer's claims that he is intellectually disabled and has an IQ of 64.

Supreme Court to take up Texas abortion law but declines to block itJustice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent on the Supreme Court taking up Texas abortion law, but declining to block it: 'every day the Court fails to grant relief i S devastating, both for individual women and for our constitutional system as a whole.' horrible Not stop eating so many Twinkies Sonya. The question is, do you think women are intelligent enough to make decisions on child birth? Do they need some guy with a funny belt buckle to weigh in on this personal matter?

Supreme Court doesn't block Texas abortion law, sets hearingWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is not immediately blocking the Texas law that bans most abortions, but has agreed to hear arguments in the case in early November. The justices said Friday they will decide whether the federal government has the right to sue over the law. If the “Supremes” allow the unconstitutional law to stand - every blue state should enact bans against possession of firearms - using the same scheme. Unbelievable! The Republican SC judges have their heads buried in sand. How else could a barbarians state law stay intact? USSupremeCourt TexasAbortionBan The search is on for this individual and their affiliations. They could be the NUMBER ONE MOST WANTED person in recent history.

Sonia Sotomayor Issues Scathing Dissent After Supreme Court Refuses to Block Texas Abortion Ban“Every day the Court fails to grant relief is devastating, both for individual women and for our constitutional system as a whole,” the justice wrote. The court will hold oral arguments… 'A total shock. Certainly something we didn't expect from the always unpredictable Sotomayor.' Said no one, anywhere.