You've read the headline. Do you think you'll still be reading car reviews in 10 years? It's something that is, perhaps not surprisingly, on the mind of someone who writes and edits car reviews for a living. If the answer is no, I hope I can come up with some other form of employment by the time 2032 rolls around.
In the last year, though, I've seen plenty of signs that this autonomous electric transport pod doomsday isn't on the horizon. First and foremost, I think we're going to see autonomous flying taxis before mass market, citizen-owned autonomous cars. Which is to say, not soon. There are just too many technological, psychological, logistical and legal challenges for the foreseeable future.
The"review" part is the trickier and more problematic element for people like me.
Now, before I start getting angry texts from my co-workers to"shut the hell up, I have a mortgage," let me now say that 45-second vertical videos shot about the rear-wheel steering of a fancy Mercedes is not the same thing as a car review. It's something you watch while waiting for your Starbucks order, not unlike the video of my friend's puppy going down a playground slide.
.embed-container { position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden; max-width: 100%; } .embed-container iframe, .embed-container object, .embed-container embed { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; }
jriswick There is a rule about asking a question in a headline, Betteridge’s Law, that this headline breaks. Yes, I will absolutely be reading car reviews.
jriswick Definitely not if car review content is this lazy.
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: screencrushnews - 🏆 544. / 51 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: screencrushnews - 🏆 544. / 51 Read more »
Source: IntEngineering - 🏆 287. / 63 Read more »
Source: LastQuake - 🏆 653. / 51 Read more »
Source: NatGeo - 🏆 537. / 51 Read more »