George W. Bush, War On Terror

George W. Bush, War On Terror

We’re Only Beginning to See the Consequences of the Bush-Era Assault on Civil Liberties

We’re only beginning to see the consequences of the Bush-era assault on civil liberties

9/9/2019 5:25:00 PM

We’re only beginning to see the consequences of the Bush-era assault on civil liberties

Like a number of “War on Terror” measures, the Terrorist Screening Database’s unconstitutionality was obvious from the jump

) was brought by 23 Muslim-Americans who complained of a “range of adverse consequences.” Plaintiffs complained of being repeatedly handcuffed at the border, searched, denied access to flights, and other issues.The ugliest detail in the lawsuit involves the sheer reach of the list. From Judge Anthony Trenga’s memorandum:

At 30, Jennifer Lawrence Remains Hollywood’s Cool Girl Next Door Two sites that amplify hoaxes given special treatment at Trump’s briefings despite restrictions Election 2020 live updates: Trump sows doubt about election legitimacy, Biden goes after his business creds

The FBI… shares TSDB information with more than 18,000 state, local, county, city, university and college, tribal, and federal law enforcement agencies and approximately 533 private entities through its National Crime Information Center (NCIC) program, which these law enforcement agencies and private entities then use to screen individuals they encounter in traffic stops, field interviews, house visits, and municipal permit processes.

After the towers fell, Americans wanted to feel safe from terror attacks, by any means necessary. The notion thatsome kind of profiling had to go onin order to tighten up security procedures was fairly uncontroversial eighteen years ago.As a result, few cared about the long-term implications of giving the state power to informally tab people terrorists, before blasting out to 18,000 different entities, including schools, embassies, and potential employers.

There was no real brake on the listmaking process, which allowed “the watchlist” to balloon. The list expanded from 680,000 people in 2013 to 1.2 million in 2017. Some 4,600 of the people on the list are said to be Americans.Inclusion on the TSDB happens according to a space-age,

Homelandversion of the infamous stop-and-frisk policing technique, another program that became an end run around probable cause. In the mid-2000s,hundreds of thousands of people in cities like New York, mostly young black and Hispanic males, were stopped every year based upon the “reasonable” or “articulable” suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime.

Similarly, a person could land on the TSDB based upon the “articulable intelligence” that a person “is engaged, has been engaged, or intends to engage” in terrorist activities.There was no requirement that a person commit a crime before being placed on the list, and being acquitted of a terrorism-related offense didn’t prevent one from being placed on this informal dishonor roll.

The mere fact of the list gave federal authorities enormous power. One whiff of a person’s name near the “known or suspected” terror roster would be enough to end applications for FAA or transportation licenses, hazmat permits, access to military bases, and a variety of government or private sector jobs or education opportunities.

Pelosi: USPS 'needed now more than ever' From The Beatles to One Direction: Groups With Multiple Members Who Have Scored Solo Hot 100 No. 1s Biden Faces A Convention Test, To Offer A Vision Beyond Beating Trump

This is probably a highlight of the program for some – it’s difficult to question the wisdom of keeping a suspected terrorist away from hazardous materials – but the huge problem was that people had no real recourse for contesting their inclusion on the list.

The official complaint method for travelers who experienced difficulties was the Department of Homeland Security’s Travel Redress Inquiry Program (TRIP). However, as Trenga noted:The submission triggers a review… which, in 98% of cases, results in a determination that the claimed travel difficulties had no connection to an individuals inclusion on the TSDB.

When the complainant is a match to someone on the watchlist, the complaint goes to the “TSC Redress Office,” which would then conduct an internal review and send the complainant a determination letter that, no matter what, would not inform the person if they were or were not on the list.

In a lot of War on Terror programs, the fact that no one can be sure if they’re even on a list becomes a major defense against challenges to the system. As anAmerican Bar Association editorialnoted back in 2011,A second doctrinal problem arises from the deeply problematic intersection between secrecy and the doctrine of standing…

For years, the government has advocated… a restrictive theory of standing… requiring would-be challengers of government surveillance programs to demonstrate that the government has actually intercepted their communications.It’s a Catch-22. You need standing to challenge an abuse of authority, but that very abuse of authority prevents you from gaining information to secure standing.

Want to claim the government is violating disclosure rules under the FOIA law? You might have a problem if you can’t prove what’s being rebuffed in a FOIA request. Want to contest your inclusion on the No-Fly List, or the TSDB? It’s a problem if you don’t even know for sure you’re on it.

In Haiti, coronavirus and a man named Barbecue test the rule of law What Should Be Harry Styles' Next Single From 'Fine Line'? Vote! How One Vogue Staffer Embraced a Minimalist Wardrobe While WFH

I watched this processplay out in court last year. When an American citizen named Bilal Abdul-Kareem, who claimed to have survived multiple drone attacks overseas, sued to get himself removed from the “Distribution Matrix,” he faced a serious hurdle because he could not prove he was on the list.

The government argued the suit should be thrown out because neither Kareem nor his co-plaintiff, a journalist named Ahmad Zaidan, could “plausibly” make a case they were on a list.“The much more plausible explanation,” the government lawyer argued in a DC court last spring, “is that plaintiff Kareem experienced explosions in Syria because he was covering the Syrian civil war as a journalist.”

The Kill List, the TDSB, and all the secret surveillance programs pose the same problem: they exist more or less completely apart from meaningful public oversight. They’re bureaucratic states within states.For instance, part of the PATRIOT Act governing the issue of National Security Letters (NSLs) – by which the FBI can demand that private companies turn over subscriber information, billing records, and other private data – allows the government to place gag orders on recipients of such letters.

Because of this, we only have a faint idea of what NSLs look like. In one rare case, a man named Nicholas Merrill balked and sued whenhis company was issued a National Security Letter. In that case, the government argued that even releasing the existence of the letter would compromise national security.

Read more: Rolling Stone »

Outgoing New York Times CEO on the stock's 400% run and what happens there if Donald Trump loses

New York Times CEO Mark Thompson is stepping down in September after eight years running the company. He talks about the company's liberal image, internal controversies and why he expects there will no longer be a physical New York Times paper in 20 years.

As finance and its so sociopathsit taking over democracies and politicians, liberty killing laws are enforced world wide.

US lawmakers mull tightening domestic terror laws to end mass shootingsPlans to tighten domestic terrorism laws by making a distinct crime under law have draw concerns for civil liberties groups.

Boris Johnson faces court challenge over threat to break law and force through BrexitCivil rights group Liberty requests a judicial review over the UK Prime Minister's threats to flout a law designed to prevent a no-deal Brexit.

Kate Spade New York's Spring Collection Featured Insta-Influencers and House Plants“Today we’re on a city safari.'

Meryl Streep's NYC penthouse is on sale for $18.25 million—take a look insideMeryl Streep has relisted her downtown Manhattan penthouse for $18.25 million. It has views of the Statue of Liberty and the Empire State Building. MakeIt Too much. Not value for ya money

Everything We Know So Far About 'This Is Us' Season 4One actor hinted that the new season will be 'disruptive' from the very beginning.

Everything We Know So Far About 'This Is Us' Season 4One actor hinted that the new season will be 'disruptive' from the very beginning.