, a robust investment in free pre-school, community college and child tax breaks, sum an eye-popping $4 trillion.The $35 billion effort falls far short of what the president has proposed, $111 billion over eight years, for water projects in his big infrastructure plan. But it is in line with what Capito and the Republican senators proposed last week as their counter offer to Biden’s package, and could serve as a piece of that or starting point in talks.
Part of the exuberance among senators this week was over the very act of legislating, carrying the bill through the give-and-take of the committee process and onto the Senate floor for amendments and debate.“Maybe we can take the Biden infrastructure plan and do the pieces of it,” he said. “Where we can get some agreement, do those together. And then the remaining things that we think need to be done, that price tag shrinks a little bit, because we’ve done some other stuff.
Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri, a member of GOP leadership, said the water bill could certainly become part of a bigger infrastructure package, “one of the building blocks going forward.”The increased spending called for in the water bill goes to two longstanding programs that work like infrastructure banks — one for drinking water and the other for wastewater. Each program is set to get up to $14.65 billion over five years under the bill.
The bill’s chief sponsor, Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., said she remembers a House hearing a few years ago, when a mother from Flint, Mich., held up a baby bottle filled with murky brown water from her tap.
Not going to happen. Senators from Arizona and W Virginia will END THEIR CAREERS IF THEY VOTE ANYTHING REMOTELY RADICAL.
How do they muscle through anything with two of the democrat senators already getting on the brakes?
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »