Voting rights act of 1965 put to the test in Supreme Court

  • 📰 NBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 86%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in an Arizona election laws case putting the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to the test for the second time in under a decade. CevallosLaw explains what is at stake this time around. - NBCNewsNOW

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

CevallosLaw Now

CevallosLaw Now We need to start doing the right thing at start holding these thugs accountable. Real simple lock their asses up up voter fraud can not be tolerated.

CevallosLaw Now Dear in south africa we are living in a reversed apartheid system where whites are classed as second class citizens with the racial BEE laws. please help us to pressure the black nationalists ANC government to reverse their business killing policies!&Farm Killings!

CevallosLaw Now If you don't want Black people to have the right to vote just say that. 🙄

CevallosLaw Now Republicans admit their intention is voter supression because it's the only way they can win. Republican lawyer admits the law is about politics, not free and fair elections.

CevallosLaw Now The covert subtleness of systemic racism.

CevallosLaw Now Need your help covering this story! My friends life depends on it please cover his trial this month in San Bernardino!!! Please contact me for more info. Mark geragos and Alexandra Kazarian is defending him! Please help save a life and bring light to injustice

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court questions need for restrictive voting laws in Voting Rights Act caseUS Supreme Court questions need for restrictive voting laws in Voting Rights Act case.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Major test for Voting Rights Act at Supreme Court as GOP pushes new election rulesAs Republicans in nearly every state push new voting restrictions in the aftermath of the 2020 election, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a major case to decide how those new rules should be judged under federal civil rights law. ... END THE FILIBUSTER!!! The Big Lie must be defeated.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court likely to uphold Arizona voting restrictionsWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court appeared ready Tuesday to uphold voting restrictions in Arizona in a key case that could make it harder to challenge a raft of other voting measures Republicans... JonLemire Voter suppression in Arizona. Republicans can’t win if they don’t cheat. pack the court. End the filibuster. Pack the courts. Grant DC and PR statehood. Get rid of the EC. Overturn the legacy of McConnell/trump.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court likely to uphold Arizona voting restrictionsThe Supreme Court appeared ready Tuesday to uphold voting restrictions in Arizona in a key case that could make it harder to challenge a raft of other voting measures Republicans have proposed following last year's elections. All six conservative justices, appointed by Republican presidents, suggested they would throw out an appellate ruling that struck down the restrictions as racially discriminatory under the landmark Voting Rights Act. The outcome could make it harder, if not impossible, to use the Voting Rights Act to sue over measures making their way through dozens of Republican-controlled state legislatures that would make it more difficult to vote. Awful and wrong. Republicans so adore voter suppression. Voting and restrictions are two words that should never be used in the same sentence. If a person is a citizen, is of voting age , then they are entitled to vote according to the constitution. All of this other stuff is stupid and designed to marginalize certain groups.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »