U.S. Supreme Court weighs scope of police power to enter homes without a warrant
U.S. Supreme Court justices on Wednesday appeared reluctant to give police unlimited power to enter a home without a warrant when pursuing a suspect for a minor crime in a case involving a California driver tailed by an officer after honking his horn while listening to music...
Lawrence Hurley4 Min ReadWASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court justices on Wednesday appeared reluctant to give police unlimited power to enter a home without a warrant when pursuing a suspect for a minor crime in a case involving a California driver tailed by an officer after honking his horn while listening to music.
FILE PHOTO: A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S. May 8, 2020. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/The driver, Arthur Lange, was later convicted of driving under the influence after being confronted inside his garage by California highway patrol officer Aaron Weikert in 2016. Lange is seeking to overturn his conviction by arguing that sobriety test evidence in the case was obtained by Weikert in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches and seizures.
The nine justices heard arguments in the case and are due to rule by the end of June. A broad decision finding that any police pursuit, whatever the nature of the suspected offense, justifies a warrantless entry appears unlikely based on comments by the justices. headtopics.com
“It seems ridiculous when your home isn’t your castle for terribly minor things,” liberal Justice Stephen Breyer said.Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts raised the example of teenagers fleeing back to their homes after being caught drinking beer in a park as an example of a situation in which warrantless entry would be inappropriate.
“It doesn’t seem to be something that would warrant the officer, you know, breaking into the house,” Roberts said.After observing Lange driving and honking his horn, Weikert began following him and intended to stop him for violating local noise restrictions, a minor infraction that carries small fines, but did not immediately turn on the police vehicle’s emergency lights, according to filings in the case.
Lange was already in his driveway when the officer caught up with him and activated his emergency lights. Weikert pulled into the driveway as Lange was driving his car into his garage. Lange later said he did not know the officer had been following him.
The garage door was just about to close when Weikert stuck his foot under the door, preventing it from shutting.Weikert said he smelled alcohol and ordered Lange to take a sobriety test. Lange was found to be more than three times over the legal limit and was charged with driving under the influence (DUI) and a noise infraction. headtopics.com
Lower courts ruled against Lange, deeming the incident a “hot pursuit” that allowed a warrantless entry. The justices potentially could rule that the incident was not a “hot pursuit,” meaning a warrant would have been needed.Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas referred to it as a “kind of meandering pursuit.”
Such a ruling still could allow police to enter houses without warrants in certain circumstances even if the underlying crime was a misdemeanor.Lange pleaded no contest to the DUI offense and was sentenced to 30 days in jail and three years of probation.
The California Court of Appeals in 2019 upheld Lange’s conviction. Lange then asked the Supreme Court to rule that police officers cannot evade the warrant requirement when chasing someone to their home when the underlying conduct constitutes a misdemeanor offense.
Under Supreme Court precedent, officers can enter a home without a warrant when they are in pursuit of a suspected felon.The issue of police powers has been in the spotlight particularly during protests in many cities last year against police brutality and racism. A broad ruling in favor of police could further expand their powers by widening their ability to enter homes without a warrant after pursuing people suspected of misdemeanor offenses, not just felonies. headtopics.com
Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham Read more: Reuters Top News »
Kaley Cuoco and Elizabeth Olsen on Obsessively Binge-Watching Each Other in ‘WandaVision’ and ‘The Flight Attendant’
Elizabeth Olsen (“Wandavision”) and Kaley Cuoco (“The Flight Attendant”) sat down for a virtual chat for Variety‘s Actors on Actors. For more, click here. HBO Max’s “The Fli…
avoidchaos Qualified immunity Now this What are we? The new Nazi’s!!!!! Outrageous!!! What happened to the constitution 😎🥁🍀 No law enforcement officer should NEVER be allowed in ur home without a warrant- period! Not much to look at here- NONE! Here we come to a crossroad where the people have to ask, will this protect the innocent or further cripple the law? Should they risk increasing the power of criminals in lieu of strengthening the integrity of police?
SWAT-style police intrusion for misdemeanor/nonviolent tickets needs to go. It is WRONG too much power/too much risk of biased (racist/sexist/vengeance/corrupt) ie. misuse-of-force violence. If anything, there should be a revisit to entering homes WITH warrants: -Only for murder suspects/danger to society -Eliminate no-knock warrants -ID as police (no plain clothes)
Supreme Court hears clash between California agribusiness and farm workers union California agribusiness looks to conservative Supreme Court to rein in state regulations that allow union organizing on private farm land. Agribusiness is literally what’s ruining the planet. The agriculture industry in California seems to be against Unionized farm workers. This affects weed farmers?
U.S. Supreme Court spurns case over California LGBT rights-related policyThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a challenge by Republican-governed Texas to a law enacted by Democratic-led California that bars state-funded travel to states deemed to be hostile to the rights of LGBT people. The 2016 measure was enacted in the most populous U.S. state in response to laws in conservative states that allowed certain businesses to refuse service to LGBT customers. Two conservative justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, said they would have heard the case.
U.S. Supreme Court spurns case over California LGBT rights-related policyThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a challenge by Republican-governed Texas to a law enacted by Democratic-led California that bars state-funded travel to states deemed to be hostile to the rights of LGBT people. thanks for this news Alito and Thomas would have heard it
Supreme Court may shield Koch-backed nonprofit from disclosing its donors to California California says it wants to check on possible fraud by charities, but nonprofits say they have a right to shield their donors' identities. morgfair Damnation..this is intolerable😠 brooklynmarie 'May' 😆😆
Appeals court upholds Ohio's Down syndrome abortion law in case with Supreme Court implicationsA US appellate court decision on Tuesday upholding an Ohio law that prohibits abortions because of fetal Down syndrome evades major Supreme Court precedent and is certain to reverberate in cases nationwide. What about the baby once it's born? Will they provide help for the family? Probably not. They are pro birth not pro child. Once the child is born then they wash their hands - it's the parents responsibility. Childcare, affordable healthcare?
Supreme Court asked to make foreign intelligence court opinions publicThe ACLU and other groups asked the Supreme Court on Monday to consider whether a special court that reviews government requests for electronic surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes must disclose significant opinions that came after 9/11. 9/11 was an inside job Trump won fair and square over Hillary. Stop wasting your time