Dec. 1, 2021, 12:47 AM UTCMADISON, Wis. — A divided Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with Republicans in a redistricting dispute, ruling that it saw no need to make significant changes to the maps that have helped the GOP win majorities in the state Legislature and congressional delegation.
The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty brought the lawsuit and argued that the fairest and most neutral way to resolve redistricting was to take a “least change” approach and adjust only for population changes. Democrats and their allies have argued that the new maps should be drawn from scratch.
In explaining why the court wouldn't consider the partisan makeup of districts, Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote for the majority that those are “political questions, not legal ones.” “Whatever comes from this corrupt nonsense, if it’s not fair to our state, it shouldn’t be accepted by federal courts, and most importantly, it won’t be accepted by the people of Wisconsin," Chheda said.
Democrats pushed for the federal courts to enact new maps, just as they have done in recent decades when the Legislature and governor couldn't agree. The state Supreme Court last handled redistricting in 1964.
Only fair, most illegals crossing the border have already registered to vote.
The entire state of NY is the same way.
😡😡😡
The have stacked the courts and cheat to win. America is at its end.
Here is the real GOP voter FRAUD !!!!
Was the Democratic side of this Wyoming case represented by marceelias ?
Did you expect any different?
If voter rights bill not passed, democracy is doomed!
Call Dale's Dead Bug!
We get 60+% of the vote there and they get 60+% of the seats. Lol, I'll bet the Rs think that's fair.
HeatherThomasAF Coincidentally, the GOP has a 4-3 majority in the Wisconsin SC. Not rigged at all. 🤣
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: billboard - 🏆 112. / 63 Read more »
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: PsychToday - 🏆 714. / 51 Read more »