Tom Cotton op-ed will not run in print, New York Times editor announces during employee town hall

  • 📰 CNN
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 95%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The editor of the NYT's editorial page said GOP Sen. Tom Cotton's controversial op-ed, posted online Wednesday, would not be published in print on Sunday as had been initially planned, multiple staffers who watched a virtual town hall told CNN Business

James Bennet, the editor of the editorial page, announced in the meeting that Cotton's op-ed, posted online Wednesday, would not be published in print on Sunday as had been initially planned, multiple staffers who watched the virtual town hall told CNN Business.New York Times says controversial Tom Cotton op-ed did not meet its standardsBennet, who apologized for the debacle, added that The Times would append an editor's note to the online version of Cotton's piece, the people said.

Sulzberger, who had issued a tepid defense for publishing the op-ed on Thursday, said at the town hall that Cotton's piece should not have run at The Times, people on the call said.Bennet, according to two of the people on the call, acknowledged to staff that he had not personally read the piece prior to its publication, though he said it had been reviewed by senior editors, and said the process"broke down" and was"rushed.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

NYT has become a GOP rag

NYTimes is not fair and balanced.

The controversy of CottonOp-ed falls under the same debate as Trump’s fight with social media companies, wherein Facebook kept his post up in contrast to Twitter’s which hid his tweet & provided context. The question for responsible media is whether the text violated nytimes

Make no mistake, nytimes hates free speech.

Interesting how the NYT which thrives on the First Amendment elects to facilitate censorship, thereby abridging the very right by which they exist. Not exactly professional or ethical.

What the hell are you pinheads afraid of?

Every news outlet continues to strip us of our first amendment if it doesn’t meet their agenda. Don’t overlook it

about red ted as found in abandoned house just mobypicture did during foundation in 11 april 2004 was appeared like super robot wars original generation females collection chevrolet nova must found on any location with flat tires and abandoned too like this

Goofy

The NYT has kneeled.

Silence dialogue Sooner or later the push back will happen And in reality you people are a very small group

Pussy

Journalism is dead... was killed by fake news and double standard such as CNN and New York Times!!!!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 4. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

New York Times staffers revolt over publication of Tom Cotton op-edStaffers at The New York Times expressed dismay Wednesday over the newspaper's decision to publish an op-ed written by Republican Sen. Tom Cotton that called for the U.S. military to be deployed in cities across the country to help restore order. nytimes A retraction is in order! BoycottNyTimes NYTimesOUT good for them
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

New York Times Gets Backlash From Staff Over Tom Cotton Op-EdSeveral New York Times staff members are criticizing an op-ed written by Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton that was published on Wednesday. They argue the piece, titled "Tom Cotton: Send In The Troops," puts its Black employees in danger. Cotton&39;s op-ed called for the military to use an "overwhelming Is this some kind of joke. CNN had a Actual vocal White Supremacist on air and no one said BOO. NYT adds a peice by a sitting member of Congress and everyone loses thier mind. Typical NYT BS
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

New York Times publisher responds to staff outrage over Tom Cotton op-edThe publisher of The New York Times sent a memo to employees on Thursday morning after dozens of staffers publicly revolted over an opinion piece in which Republican Sen. Tom Cotton called for the US military to be deployed to cities across the country during the current protests. The Times editorial page editor made a good journalistic call. Even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then. Yes, how dare someone be given a platform when sharing an opinion differing from the race baiting identity politics flag waiving of the woke left proflevin It’s deplorable that the nytimes published SenTomCotton ‘s unconstitutional, dictatorial powergrab propaganda. The nytimes helped George W Bush’s re-election in 2004 by sitting on a report of a secret surveillance program for about 1 year...
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

New York Times says controversial Tom Cotton op-ed did not meet its standardsIn a stunning reversal, The New York Times said Thursday evening that a controversial op-ed from Republican Sen. Tom Cotton did not meet its standards. The statement came only hours after the newspaper's editorial page editor, James Bennet, defended publishing it amid outrage from staff. They have standards? I’d have never thought twice about reading it. But, now I will. Thanks for the heads up. The New York Times has killed Journalism! God help America with this Democrat state run media!
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

After backlash, New York Times admits it should not have run Tom Cotton op-edThe New York Times admitted Thursday it erred in publishing an op-ed column by Sen. Tom Cotton calling for the military to quell protests. The hawkish, one-sided column published Wednesday outraged many, including staff members, many of whom tweeted in solidarity : "Running this puts black nytimes staff in danger." In a statement late Thursday, the Times said Cotton's piece did not meet its standards, though it did not explain exactly why it was published. "We've examined the piece and the process leading up to its publication. This review made clear that a rushed editorial process led to the publication of an Op-Ed that did not meet our standards. As a result, we're planning to examine both short term and long term changes, to include expanding our fact checking operation and reducing the number of Op-Eds we publish." A separate report by the Times late Thursday said opinion-page editor James Bennet had not read the column before publication. Inhave to argue with the bosses now. It was an opinion piece. It was just his opinion. I've read worse. Whatever... No not “admits”.... they CAVED! Disgusting. Keep in mind it was just hours after they ran it.... BOTH Editor and publisher came out and VIGOROUSLY DEFENDED THE PRINTING!!! They simply caved to the screaming lunatic left!! People... it was an OP-ED!! Opinion. NYTNotAFreePress So much for 'the free press'
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »