3 astrophysicists revealed structure of the universe to win the 2019 Nobel Prize
Jim Peebles, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz just won the 2019 Nobel Prize in Physics. It couldn't be more well-deserved.
goes to three individuals — Jim Peebles, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz — for discoveries in theoretical cosmology and exoplanets. At last, looking into space and existentially dreaming of what's out there, and then physically/astronomically discovering it, has its own Nobel Prize.
The galaxy NGC 7331 and smaller, more distant galaxies beyond it. The farther away we look, the farther back in time we see. We will eventually reach a point where no galaxies at all have formed if we go back far enough. Understanding what our Universe is made of and how it evolved to be the way it is today is an enormous existential question, but one that science is answering as never before.
Adam Block/Mount Lemmon SkyCenter/University of ArizonaWhen you picture the Universe, you probably start thinking of individual objects like stars and galaxies, where they're located in space relative to one another, and what those objects are doing today. This line of thought has great scientific value, and many top-of-the-line researchers work on exactly those topics.
However, we don't have to restrict ourselves to individual objects, and we don't have to limit ourselves to what we see those various objects doing right now. We can think on larger scales; we can think about the origin and evolution and growth of everything in the Universe, from the smallest cosmic scales up to the scale of the entire observable Universe, and speculatively even beyond that.
The quantum fluctuations that occur during inflation get stretched across the Universe, and when inflation ends, they become density fluctuations. This leads, over time, to the large-scale structure in the Universe today, as well as the fluctuations in temperature observed in the CMB. The growth of structure from these seed fluctuations, and their imprints on the power spectrum of the Universe and the CMB's temperature differentials, can be used to determine various properties about our Universe. This entire field of physical cosmology was built upon the foundation laid by Jim Peebles.
E. Siegel, with images derived from ESA/Planck and the DoE/NASA/ NSF interagency task force on CMB researchOur understanding of the Universe transformed tremendously during the 20th century. As a species, we finally began to understand the physics and astrophysics driving the entire Universe. For millennia, humanity pondered the biggest questions about the Universe:
How did it start?What the rules are that govern it?What's present within it?And how do the various objects and structures within it arise, grow, evolve, and appear today?One of our crowning scientific achievements has been to provide answers — scientifically valid, robust, but still always just provisional answers — that give us tremendous predictive power. Our observations have matched our theoretical predictions, and that has confirmed and validated the best picture we've synthesized over the past century.
On a logarithmic scale, the Universe nearby has the solar system and our Milky Way galaxy. But far beyond are all the other galaxies in the Universe, the large-scale cosmic web, and eventually the moments immediately following the Big Bang itself. Although we cannot observe farther than this cosmic horizon which is presently a distance of 46.1 billion light-years away, there will be more Universe to reveal itself to us in the future. The observable Universe contains 2 trillion galaxies today, but as time goes on, more Universe will become observable to us, perhaps revealing some cosmic truths that are obscure to us today.
Wikipedia user Pablo Carlos BudassiSome 13.8 billion years ago, the fabric of spacetime was empty, but full of energy inherent to space itself: a period of cosmic inflation. Then, at one particular moment in time, inflation came to an end, converting that energy into matter, antimatter and radiation, and giving rise to the hot Big Bang that started it all. Our Universe, as we know it, arose from this state, and was also born filled with dark matter, dark energy, and with tiny density-and-temperature imperfections that departed from a perfectly uniform Universe by about 1-part-in-30,000.
The Universe — ruled by the laws of quantum physics that govern matter and the gravitational force that governs the curvature and evolution of spacetime — expanded and cooled and gravitated, giving rise to a bath of leftover radiation, a Universe filled with light and heavy elements, stars, galaxies, clusters, the cosmic web, and more.
Our entire cosmic history is theoretically well-understood in terms of the frameworks and rules that govern it. It's only by observationally confirming and revealing various stages in our Universe's past that must have occurred, like when the first elements formed, when atoms became neutral, when the first stars and galaxies formed, and how the Universe expanded over time, that we can truly come to understand what makes up our Universe and how it expands and gravitates in a quantitative fashion. The relic signatures imprinted on our Universe from an inflationary state before the hot Big Bang give us a unique way to test our cosmic history, subject to the same fundamental limitations that all frameworks possess.
Nicole Rager Fuller / National Science FoundationThis is the story that we know to be true today, but only the barest bones of this framework were in place back in the early 1960s. Not only wasn't inflation, dark matter or dark energy part of the story yet, but the Big Bang was only one of a few competing ideas about the Universe's origin. We knew how successful General Relativity was, but we were still working out the details of the nuclear forces. We did not even know the particle content of our Universe.
And that's where Jim Peebles' started his career: with that picture of the Universe. By applying the laws of physics to the system of the entire Universe, Peebles began to work out details of what the Universe would have been like in its early stages, and how those details would evolve, over time, to produce visible signatures we could look for today. At a critical moment in history, he began working out the theoretical details that would be put to the observational test.
Both simulations (red) and galaxy surveys (blue/purple) display the same large-scale clustering patterns as one another, even when you look at the mathematical details. The Universe, particularly on smaller scales, is not perfectly homogeneous, but on large scales the homogeneity and isotropy is a good assumption to better than 99.99% accuracy.
Gerard Lemson and the Virgo ConsortiumThe tiny, initial imperfections that the Universe was born with would try to gravitationally grow from the moment they were created, but the intense radiation pressure in the early, hot, dense Universe smooths out the structure on scales that are too small. Instead, particles and antiparticles collide, blasting any complex structure apart, and eventually annihilating as the Universe expands and cools.
But as it expands and cools, more and more things become possible. Protons and neutrons can fuse into atomic nuclei, and we can use the laws of physics to calculate what the ratios of the different elements and isotopes produced should be, and then observe the Universe to test it. As the Universe cools farther, neutral atoms can stably form, and all that radiation (produced from annihilation) should freely stream through the neutral Universe, presenting an observable signature of a leftover blackbody signal just a few degrees above absolute zero: the Cosmic Microwave Background.
The relative heights and positions of these acoustic peaks, derived from the data in the Cosmic Microwave Background, are definitively consistent with a Universe made of 68% dark energy, 27% dark matter, and 5% normal matter. Deviations are tightly constrained, and the framework of this (and other detailed predictions) were developed by Jim Peebles years or even decades before the data or equipment was good enough to decisively determine the Universe's contents.
Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation - Planck Collaboration (Ade, P.A.R. et al.) arXiv:1502.02114And finally, gravitational growth should at last occur, as matter attracts other matter and begins to collapse on all scales. As the cosmic web grows, it's combatted by the physical effect of the expansion, and only regions that become overdense enough soon enough will eventually grow into structure. The structures you form will be very sensitive to the contents of the Universe, and how that structure clusters together on large scales can allow you to learn about what the cosmos is made of. Those signals should then also be present in the detailed fluctuations in
the Cosmic Microwave Background; signals that were at last verified with satellites like COBE, WMAP and Planck.Although there are many important contributors to this field, there are two that stand out, historically, as pioneers in the transformation of cosmology into a hard science with precision data: Jim Peebles and the late Soviet physicist
Yakov Zeldovich. The theoretical frameworks these two individual (independently) derived and applied to our realistic Universe are the foundations of practically all of modern cosmology.Zeldovich died in 1987 (there are no posthumous Nobels), so Peebles* richly deserves the half of the Nobel Prize he was just awarded.
A standard cosmic timeline of our Universe's history. Our Earth didn't come to exist until 9.2 billion years after the Big Bang, requiring many generations of stars to live and die before planets with rocky and metallic cores could exist. However, today the Universe should be rich in stars with exoplanets, and they have come in forms and distributions that have forced us to re-evaluate how planetary systems form and evolve.
NASA/CXC/M.WeissComing down from cosmic scales to Solar System scales, we need to go through billions of years of cosmic evolution. Stars live-and-die and explode, recycling their now-fused elements into future generations of stars. When enough generations have passed, and the material that will be found in star-forming regions is rich enough in heavy elements, stars can form with massive planets around them.
Those planets should come complete with metallic and/or rocky cores, just like all the planets in our Solar System. They should orbit their parent star in an ellipse, governed by the laws of gravity and having observable effects on the spectrum of the star they're orbiting. The gravitational planetary tug should redshift-and-blueshift the star periodically, while planets that are aligned with the star's line-of-sight to Earth will transit in front of it, blocking a portion of its light.
As a planet orbits its parent star, both the star and planet will orbit in ellipses around their mutual center of mass. Along our line-of-sight, the star will appear to move in an oscillatory fashion: moving towards us (and having its light blueshift) followed by it moving away from us (and seeing a corresponding redshift). This method, in 1995, yielded us the first exoplanet orbiting a Sun-like star.
© Johan Jarnestad/The Royal Swedish Academy Of Sciences30 years ago, only the Sun was known to have planets around it. Soon after, though, technology advanced to the point where the shift in a star's spectral lines from"wobbling" back-and-forth would show up in long-period observations of that particular star. While a controversial detection
was first made in 1988and the first non-controversial detection came for planets around pulsars (a type of dead star) in 1992, neither heralded the exoplanet revolution quite like the next giant leap.The first"normal" planet around a"normal" (Sun-like) star came in 1995, courtesy of Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz, an advisor/student pair who share the other half of this year's Nobel Prize. Once
Mayor and Queloz's publicationcame out, exoplanets became all the rage. This stellar wobble method has since been augmented by other techniques like direct imaging, microlensing and planetary transits, revealing a total of over 4,000 confirmed exoplanets so far. With TESS currently flying and additional space telescopes on the horizon, the field is richer than ever.
Today, we know of over 4,000 confirmed exoplanets, with more than 2,500 of those found in the Kepler data. These planets range in size from larger than Jupiter to smaller than Earth. Yet because of the limitations on the size of Kepler and the duration of the mission, the majority of planets are very hot and close to their star, at small angular separations. TESS has the same issue with the first planets it's discovering: they're preferentially hot and in close orbits. Only through dedicates, long-period observations (or direct imaging) will we be able to detect planets with longer period (i.e., multi-year) orbits. New and near-future observatories are on the horizon, and should reveal new worlds where right now there are only gaps.
NASA/Ames Research Center/Jessie Dotson and Wendy Stenzel; missing Earth-like worlds by E. SiegelThis Nobel is also notable for the elegant way in which it handled a number of controversies. Scientists who work on exoplanets and on large-scale cosmology often compete with one another for funding and resources, but rely on telescopes with similar technologies and often mission-share, as they will with WFIRST and the James Webb Space Telescope. Awarding a Nobel to both cosmology and exoplanets together is a bridge between these two sub-fields, and may encourage them to pursue more joint missions in the future.
Similarly, there were about a dozen Nobel-worthy individuals in the field of exoplanet sciences, with the elephant in the room being that one of the field'smost influential scientists is a known and repeated sexual harasser. In granting a Nobel to Mayor and Queloz, the committee rewarded the exoplanet community while gracefully sidestepping a potential public relations catastrophe.
It will take longer-duration missions with excellent light-gathering power and sensitivity to reveal the first Earth-like world around a Sun-like star. There are plans in both NASA's and ESA's timelines for such missions. Some of these missions, like James Webb and WFIRST, will also be extraordinary for their cosmological capabilities.
NASA and partnersWith only a small percentage of the Universe and the nearest exoplanets currently revealed to us, the coming decades should see scientists in these fields push the frontiers forwards into unknown territory. Over 90% of the two trillion galaxies present in our observable Universe remain undiscovered; only 4,000 exoplanets are known in a galaxy that should contain trillions of them, including billions that may be Earth-like.
This year, the selection committee made an excellent choice for both science and society. As we look to our future, remember that the answers to some of the biggest existential questions we can pose are written on the face of the Universe itself. Combining theoretical predictions with the observational suite of data reveals the Universe to us as nothing else can. Congratulations to
2019's Nobel Laureates in Physics and their revolutionary discoveries. May it compel us all appreciate and celebrate the unbridled power of science to sate our intellectual curiosity.The 2019 Nobel Prize in Physics goes to Jim Peebles, who is awarded half the prize for his work on the foundations of physical cosmology, and to Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz, who are awarded one-quarter (each) of the prize for their discovery of the first exoplanet around a Sun-like star.
© Nobel Media; Illustration: Niklas Elmehed* —Disclosure: Jim Peebles was the academic advisor, at Princeton, of Professor Jim Fry, who was in turn the author's academic advisor during his own Ph.D. studies at the University of Florida. The author acknowledges this fact that some might see as a conflict, but has nothing but congratulations for Prof. Peebles.Read more: Forbes »
Lipsy337 Up your street By studying the isotopes you can get to the original. Matter does not annihilate becomes antimatter. There are links that do not close! This is 🧢 it was definitely Terrence Howard who revealed this. Deepneuron naveedbcn
Kaelin, Ratcliffe and Semenza win 2019 Nobel Prize in MedicineScientists William Kaelin, Peter Ratcliffe and Gregg Semenza win Nobel prize for their work on cellular adaptation to fluctuating oxygen which paved the way for new strategies to fight anaemia and cancer
The life-saving science behind the 2019 Nobel Prize for MedicineThe research could lead to new treatments for potentially deadly conditions including cancer, heart attack, and stroke. - NBCNewsMACH
Nobel season opens with Medicine PrizeAnnouncement of the Nobel Medicine Prize to kick off an unusual 2019 Nobel season in which two literature laureates will be crowned after a scandal postponed last year's award
Nobel prize for medicine: how oxygen affects cellsThis year’s winners helped explain oxygen-sensitive processes and their effect on cancers, heart attacks and strokes
Nobel Medicine Prize won by doctors for work on cells' response to oxygenTwo scientists from the United States and one from Britain won the 2019 Nobel Medicine Prize Here is a look at previous and current NobelPrize winners Via ReutersGraphics Graphics Where is Israel in the illustration? Graphics Neither was named Trump... Graphics Seems like UK and Germany are more or equally powerful on a per capital basis, and same appears to be true for the EU as a whole! Europe appears to be the real innovation powerhouse innovation
3 win Nobel Prize in Physics for work to understand cosmosA Canadian-American cosmologist and two Swiss scientists won this year&39;s Nobel Prize in Physics on Tuesday for their work in understanding how the universe has evolved from the Big Bang and the blockbuster discovery of the first known planet outside our solar system. Canadian-born James Peebles,