, warning darkly that it favored “communal approaches to child-rearing” rather than a “family-centered approach.”
I think most of the members of the Democratic caucus recognize that millions of women dropped out of the workforce because they couldn't get child care.Lawmakers did manage to pass some other, more targeted federal initiatives that remain in operation today. Among the most important is the 1990, which gives states money to subsidize care for low-income families. But because it’s a block grant, the funds are limited.
“I felt like people here were not facing the reality that me and so many of my peers were facing,” Murray said.broader political sisterhood that includes both the Speaker of the House and the Vice President. “We have more members of Congress who are working women themselves, or men whose wives are working and they’re dealing with [child care] as much as everybody else,” Murray said.Rep. Bobby Scott knows that a serious child care program would require a lot of new government spending. But he thinks his colleagues finally understand why it's worthwhile.
Another factor pushing child care to the top of the agenda has been the persistent, behind-the-scenes work of advocacy and research organizations documenting the costs of America’s weak child care system, both in terms of child welfare and to the economy as a whole.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Todaysparent - 🏆 313. / 61 Read more »
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »