The Supreme Court May Kick Off 2023 With a Huge Ruling for Gun Rights

  • 📰 Slate
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 55 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

An upcoming SCOTUS ruling on the shadow docket would turbocharge the Second Amendment—again.

clearly and demonstrably erred

” in applying “accepted standards.” If five justices reach this conclusion, then no gun restriction is safe. Consider Suddaby’s ruling: The judge struck down New York’s ban on concealed carry in public parks, zoos, airports, buses, houses of worship, bars, conference centers, banquet halls, protests, and many medical facilities, including addiction treatment centers. He also invalidated a provision of the law that stopped permit-holders from taking their weapons onto private property, like businesses or homes, unless the property owner expressly consented to their presence.

Suddaby’s efforts to find historical “consensus” were even wackier. At first, he demanded three or more historical analogues, because two “can also appear as a mere trend.” Later, the judge shifted his method, giving “more weight” to old laws in states that made up a “larger percentage of the nation’s population at the time, according to the nearest decennial census.” So laws governing Maine and Rhode Island cannot establish a consensus, but laws governing Virginia and Pennsylvania can.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 716. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

It's taking the Supreme Court longer to hear casesLengthy arguments have to do with a change the justices made to their argument style tied to the coronavirus pandemic, leading to the justices asking more questions.
Source: kgun9 - 🏆 584. / 51 Read more »

At the Supreme Court, it’s taking longer to hear casesWhen lawyers argue before the Supreme Court, a small white light goes on to tell them when their time is almost expired and then a red light signals when they should stop. But arguments this term are extending well beyond the red light's cue.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

At the Supreme Court, it’s taking longer to hear casesJustices have said in the past that lawyers' written briefs, not oral arguments, most influence their decisions, so it's unclear if the extra time is really helping them decide cases.
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »

Illinois SAFE-T Act: Cash bail elimination put on hold by state Supreme CourtA last-minute decision by the Illinois Supreme Court has sent the Attorney General's office scrambling. Over 30 shootings this weekend 7 dead. And they still want to let these animals 2 walk free. They should be scrambling to follow the laws on the books and keep them in jail. Democrats love their criminals. The IL Supreme Court is all pro crime democrats. This will become law soon.
Source: fox32news - 🏆 547. / 51 Read more »

At the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear casesArguments that usually lasted an hour in the morning have stretched well beyond two, and on many days it's long past lunchtime before the court breaks. Lets talk about the Supremes working after lunch. So we don't talk about the open Southern border. When was the last time you reported on the child sex trafficking, fentanyl drug cartels in partnership with the biden administration? News flash, Never. Lazy journalism.
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »