It's hard to understand how or why cancer in one part of the body can have effects on an entirely different part of the body—but that's exactly what happened to one woman who, after noticing her palms looked odd, was eventually diagnosed with lung cancer., which follows a 73-year-old woman, who first presented to a dermatology clinic with "pruritic and painful lesions" on the palms of her hands.
When examining her hands, doctors noted “sharp demarcation of the folds in the lines of her hands,” in addition to “a velvety appearance of palmar surfaces and ridging of the skin.” She was soon diagnosed with tripe palms, a condition closely associated with cancer—usually lung and gastric.Doctors conducted more tests, including a computer tomography of her chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and found an irregular nodule in the left upper lobe of her lungs and enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes .
The condition is extremely rare, so there's very little research on it, but, according to another case report published in 2014 in the journal
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
National Archives Blurs Anti-Trump Messages in Women’s March PhotoSigns that made references to women's anatomy were also blurred. It failed Bullshit! they wanted to avoid upsetting the baby in the Oval Office. Or simply taking orders from that baby censorshipdictatorstyle To that end, they decided to stop being the national archives.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »
National Archives apologizes for altering Women's March photo after backlashThe word 'Trump' was removed from protesters' signs, as well as references to women's private parts. National Archives will not apologizes for altering Women's March photo after backlash, Nancy orders!!
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Washington Post: National Archives admits to altering photo of 2017 Women's MarchThe National Archives admitted to altering a 2017 photograph of the Women's March to censor signs referencing women's anatomy and President Donald Trump's name, according to The Washington Post. Liberal hypocrites! If they are so for women’s rights, have some decency and not parade around posters of that nature! It further degrades women! So pathetic! Fake news. I never will trust another news agency ever on their reporting. It’s why I don’t watch the news anymore.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Blurring 'Trump,' other words in Women's March photo was mistake, National Archives saysThe U.S. National Archives and Records Administration says it 'made a mistake' by blurring the word 'Trump' as well as 'words that referenced parts of a woman's body' in a photo showing protest signs from the 2017 Women’s March. realDonaldTrump argued in court, infront of a flabbergasted judge, that he’s immune from any criminal prosecution,even if he shoots someone dead Now, his impeachment team is arguing a President can’t be held accountable for Abuse of Power! If we don’t stop this, We have a King! Leftists are nasty GodHatesTrump to MAGA
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Study Finds Women At The Top Experience More Sexual HarassmentAccording to a new study, when women are in a place of power, they actually aren’t less likely to experience sexual harassment—they might even be more vulnerable to it.
Source: ForbesWomen - 🏆 477. / 51 Read more »
Study Finds Women At The Top Experience More Sexual HarassmentAccording to a new study, when women are in a place of power, they actually aren’t less likely to experience sexual harassment—they might even be more vulnerable to it. I think it is ' Women who appear powerful..experience more sexual harassment.' U can walk in a room broke as F but strong as F and be SEXUAL harassed for that ' DON't give an eff VIBE!' People who sexual harass are exposing their FEAR towards your power. It is a POWER PLAY. Wow
Source: ForbesWomen - 🏆 477. / 51 Read more »