that alleged infringements on the freedom of religion will likely trump public health and safety restrictions. At least according to the current Supreme Court.
It signaled yet again that alleged infringement on the freedom of religion will likely trump public health and safety.There is a reason you may not have heard about this case before: It's part of the court’s so-called, a procedure that was meant to be used only for emergency cases. This means that this case was never orally argued before the court and it was never on the court’s normal calendar.
There were no full briefings by each side. And there was no signed and full opinion. On issues as important as how we balance the free exercise of religion with a state’s power to implement restrictions for our health and safety, one would certainly expect that increased transparency, including a full airing of the issues, both in written and verbal form, would be preferable.
A state’s police powers are not absolute. If, for instance, scientific evidence showed that it is virtually impossible to spread Covid-19 indoors, the government would not have any grounds to restrict indoor gatherings in the name of health and safety. But
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.