last week that, if finalized, would overturn Roe v. Wade. During one especially illuminating moment, Chief Justice John Roberts attempted to draw Julie Rikelman—the litigation director of the Center for Reproductive Rights, who was arguing to have a ban on abortions after fifteen weeks in the state of Mississippi overturned—into a back-and-forth about the significance of the cutoff for having.
Last fall, Myers marshalled a hundred and fifty-four economists to file an amicus brief against the abortion ban, in which they outlined decades of research on how unwanted pregnancies can affect women’s education, employment, and earning prospects, and can impact the labor market more broadly. “Economists as a whole don’t have disagreement about this,” Myers said. “This is not a question about the minimum wage—if you bring that up, then they’ll start arguing.
In the brief filed to the Court, Thomas Dobbs and the State of Mississippi presented an argument about modern parenthood that seemed disconnected from reality. Dobbs, Mississippi’s state health officer, argues that the Roe v. Wade decision—and a subsequent Supreme Court case that upheld Roe in 1992, Planned Parenthood v. Casey—were simply no longer relevant to women and parents. “The march of progress has leftbehind,” the brief reads.
They don’t care about any of that.
But, I’ll bet Emily zoster has something to say?
Tell that to the unborn baby! See if they agree? Oh, wait! They can’t speak for themselves!😡
You have to be insane if you think the Republicans care. Dead women, children, people of color ate their GOAL, not what they want to protect. Anyone still amazed at this should be treated for their mental issues, that is what you have if you lie to yourself about the truth.
I know we all probably must have heard about Forex but don't know how it works I tried it a week ago by a fellow tweeter who recommended me to Natalia16Gavin she guided me through and i made a return of $9,000 after a week of trading, connect with her 👉Natalia16Gavin
Uh, that's the whole point of the ban.
And justice Thomas gave a rat's ass along with Trumps sycophant judges he put on the misogynist court
Which is the point of banning abortions. Look at the people who legislate the ban. See any poor women in there?
Sadly they don't give a damn. Disadvantaging women seems to be part of their goal. Add to that a ban on contraception and women will be little more than house slaves.
They should have targeted their efforts to the states where this issue will correctly be dealt with. They wasted their time. Doesn't seem like a very efficient use of an economist's time. Who funded their decades of research?
Abortion bans are misogynistic in every way.
Why would misogynists possibly care about that?
The same economists that said inflation was temporary?
How many felt empowered to get an abortion because Lizzo said so? How many got an abortion for career choices because they never saw a Super Star openly pregnant until Cardi B?! Held off on pregnancy and got abortions, not poor, not uneducated but simply because of society.
Contraception is cheap, widely available, easy to use, and highly effective. If you can't be bothered to use it, and you put yourself at risk of getting pregnant, I have 0 sympathy for you and you don't have a legal right to murder unborn children.
JonnaChissus The .GOP cult/crime syndicate—a onetime political party—is comprised of PSYCHOPATHS (such as TRUMP, many GOP pols, & SCOTUS majority, long normalized by our failed MSM) +their psychotic human pets. .POTUS & Dems are truly fighting evil to save our democracy.
They should protect themselves from unwanted pregnancies. It’s a big responsibility.
What is the economic impact of having your life extinguished from before birth ? What is the impact on GDP on killing millions of potential workers before they are born ? It’s a about the children in case you hadn’t figured it out.
how about stop being sluts?
The Irony of 'Independence Day' Where women have less, 'Independence!'
…albeit an unpalatable topic, We MUST also address the risk of Catastrophic Global overpopulation. Resources vs population graph never lies. A Serious concern that needs Honest solutions for everyone.
They don't care about women.
Thank goodness abortion wasn’t banned in the US.
look at my boobs😘
Killing for financial gain is not ethical.
That's what they want. Push women out of workforce, open up those jobs for men, keep women loaded with kids & utterly dependent on men for their financial survival. She can't divorce him even if he beats her everyday bcuz she can't feed her kids if she leaves. That's GOP heaven.
That's the problem... men don't want the competition from strong women.
But that’s exactly what republicans *want* for women.
Republicans: 'So now you understand us.'
And that’s exactly why the GOP is forcing birth on us. They don’t want us to be educated, making our own money or living a middle or upper class life.
I swear the Republican party is trying to outlaw sex.
Foolish media publication,what of the kids killed ,any research
No worries! Republicans undoubtedly have plans for nationwide workhouses. A domestic supply of infants and their tramp mothers will provide free labor for the corporate overlords.
This would suggest that abortion is used as a means of birth control.
aspirationalCARE. Do your friends at Davos require you to frame it as such😂😂
Who you sponsored, vanguard or state street? I worked for both, a stacked hierarchy of dunces claus fur lyfe 🥴🙃
That’s everything the republicans don’t want. They desperately want the 1950’s back.
And the babies killed are more likely to do what?
You see, the fanatics don’t care about that.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TODAYshow - 🏆 389. / 55 Read more »
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »
Source: ScaryMommy - 🏆 116. / 63 Read more »
Source: FoxBusiness - 🏆 458. / 53 Read more »
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »