Supreme Court won’t stop Covid vaccine mandate for Maine health workers

  • 📰 CNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 22 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 72%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to hear an emergency appeal of a vaccine requirement imposed on Maine health care workers.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to hear an emergency appeal of a Covid vaccine requirement imposed on Maine health care workers, the latest defeat for opponents of such mandates.

It was the first time the Supreme Court weighed in on a statewide vaccine mandate. It previously rejected challenges of vaccine requirements for New York City teachers and Indiana University staff and students. Opponents tried to block the mandate, but a federal judge rejected the request on Oct. 20. The judge said the record indicated regular testing alone wasn't sufficient to stop the spread of the delta variant.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

⚕️ WHCOVIDResponse CDCgov NIH US_FDA HHSGov and WHO Help Protect: 🟣 PublicHealth 🟣 PopulationHealth ✅ Get Vaccinated Against: ✔️ COVID19 ✔️ Influenza / Flu ✔️ Other Diseases, e.g., Measles ✅ Wear a Mask 😷 Indoors ✅ Avoid Large Crowds ✅ Wash Your Hands

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 12. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Opinion | Supreme Court term limits wouldn’t solve anythingLifetime tenure is a strength of the high court. Ending that would do more harm than good. The SCOTUS lost legitimacy when 3 seats were stolen and autocrat enablers installed. Time to play hardball POTUS Hot take from a Bezos owned news outlet talking about how reforming a corporation friendly Supreme Court wouldn't solve anything
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court rules for police in two lawsuits claiming excessive forceUS Supreme Court rules that police officers in two cases should be shielded from lawsuits claiming their conduct killed one man and injured another. Agreed, police officers aren't trained properly and it varies from state to state. Roads are different, weather is different, and people are different. So we can't call police criminals, they defend the constitution still. I just believe that police should be appointed by mayors. The Supreme Court is illegitimate. The decisions are ideological, not legal. The police are court officers and the American justice system is incapable of fairly judging itself.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court sides with police officers seeking 'qualified immunity' in two use-of-force casesPolice-reform advocates have called for an end to qualified immunity, arguing it insulates officers from accountability for wrongdoing.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court Backs Qualified Immunity For Cops Accused Of Excessive ForceI'm a British-born reporter covering breaking news for Forbes. Reach me: jmcevoyforbes.com Surprise. Not. Explain this to me like I'm a 5th grader. ... When it is proven, and without a doubt, that a police officer used unnecessary and excessive force....they/he/she is above the law? Does that sound about right. No, I mean, does THAT sound right?
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court again protects police accused of excessive forceThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday granted requests by police officers in separate cases from California and Oklahoma for legal protection under a doctrine called 'qualified immunity' from lawsuits accusing them of using excessive force. The justices overturned a lower court's decision allowing a trial in a lawsuit against officers Josh Girdner and Brandon Vick over the fatal shooting of a hammer-wielding man in Tahlequah, Oklahoma. jeffgoldesq 👎 Danger
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Justice Department asks Supreme Court to temporarily block Texas law that bans abortions after 6 weeksCNBC's Julianna Tatelbaum chats with market analyst Susannah Streeter. They’ll be examining the outlook for the markets, discussing upcoming opportunities and revealing potential high-growth stocks on Susannah’s watchlist.\n\nSusannah Streeter is a Senior Investment and Markets Analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown. Join us on Monday, October 11th at 12pm BST \u002F 7pm SIN \u002F 7am ET.\n Zero chance of making a change. Political. BS. It does not block anything.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »