Supreme Court strikes down New York gun law along ideological lines

  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 42 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 59%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of New York gun owners who want to carry weapons outside the home. The 6-3 decision, which divided the court along the usual ideological lines, follows a series of high-profile mass shootings.

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of gun owners who want to carry their weapons outside the home, striking down New York state’s rules giving local officials broad authority to deny such permits for almost any reason.

“We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need,” Thomas wrote. “That is not how the First Amendment works when it comes to unpopular speech or the free exercise of religion. It is not how the Sixth Amendment works when it comes to a defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him. And it is not how the Second Amendment works when it comes to public carry for self-defense.

“The Court’s decision does not prohibit States from imposing licensing requirements for carrying a handgun for self-defense,” Kavanaugh emphasized in a brief concurring opinion Roberts joined. “Since the start of this year alone … there have already been 277 reported mass shootings — an average of more than one per day,” Breyer wrote.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

6 judges selected by the federalist society. Where in the constitution does it said a non government group is to select judges?

Well this should prove you definitely don’t have to be smart or ethical to be on the Supreme Court.

Following the decision, two of the lawyers responsible for the win said they are parting with their law firm, Kirkland & Ellis, after it announced it would no longer handle Second Amendment litigation.

GoodGriefCharlieBrown did Lucy pull the football away again, who saw that coming?

17 of our largest cities in US set all-time murder rates last year and into this year. That’s in the history of the universe. Murders are done by criminals. Mainly In cities. Mainly by repeat offenders.

Great news!

News1America If the Gun laws were enforce, gun violence would go down. Criminals who us a gun to commit a felony, should have a mandatory 50 year sentence with no possibility of parol. It’s time for predators to defend themselves from predators in prison…..

It's not a coincidence that this ruling came down at the same time Congress is working to tighten up gun laws.

More junk from a junk court and they aren’t done yet.

How fitting the the ‘Justice’ implicated in the January 6th Insurrection wrote today’s insane decision…

The 2nd Amendment doesn't signify any age to possess a gun. Maybe we should supply a gun to every year old when they start school? The court shouldn't be able to infringe upon their rights.

Can you report the news without your overt political bias?

DISPICABLE.

A major win for the American People with the SCOTUS protecting their individual rights from the government.

So the purpose of arresting the man outside Kavanaugh's house was for what then? I guess he was entitled to be there.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 381. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rules in major case involving carrying concealed guns in public for self-defenseThe case, with nationwide impact, involved a New York law requiring a permit to do so. And NOW you know why senate republicans were supporting the meager gun reform measures. Horrible I'm just curious how many of the justices will feel this when we show up en masse to their homes armed.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court strikes down gun law that requires license for public carryThe Court's six conservatives voted in concert as the three liberals voted in opposition. The opinion was written by Clarence Thomas. Shall not be infringed. Government will always try to exchange liberty for the illusion of safety. Most tyrannical regimes started with taking away guns or registering guns. Hah Suck it libs!!!
Source: abc15 - 🏆 263. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court strikes down New York gun law in major ruling, saying Americans have right to carry guns in publicThe Supreme Court said Thursday that Americans have a right to carry guns in public, a major expansion of gun rights. Chicago has to become more like the south when it come to guns.There are less gun confirmations on southern streets. The reason is because everyone could be carrying a gun a person is more likely to de escalate violence from happening with guns . To where Chicago can’t control.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »

Supreme Court Rules Against New York's Gun Permit LawThe Supreme Court ruled against a New York law that restricts who can carry a firearm in public in a 6-3 decision that comes weeks after 19 children and two teachers were fatally shot in an Uvalde, Texas, school. The court decided whether denying a concealed-carry license for self-defense violated the Second Amendment. Supreme Court decisions in 2008 and 2010… Love it
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court strikes down N.Y. concealed carry gun lawThe majority opinion says it is a constitutional right to carry a weapon in public for self-defense purposes. Great news for America. Bad news for the anti gun left about time. meanwhile, in ny, cr1me up apx 30% since jan 20 2021, because the cr1m1nals know they'll walk. NYC is a w-rzone in major loss for public safety* FIFY
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rules Maine's exclusion of religious schools from state tuition program is unconstitutionalThe court ruled 6-3 along ideological lines. It's about time parents should be able to educate their under there religious values just like my parents did. And so glad my dad and mom did right for my sake. That’s great news! This is terrible news. NO more constatation. Soon the Baptist will make it illegal for other religion's to exist. That's why we had separation of church and state.
Source: ALNewsNetwork - 🏆 583. / 51 Read more »