Supreme Court sidesteps abortion cases, shortly after striking Louisiana restrictions

  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 65 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 29%
  • Publisher: 59%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court declined to take up several abortion cases, just days after striking down a Louisiana law in the first major abortion decision since President Trump’s two appointees joined the bench

But the justices, citing their decision in the Louisiana case, also sent back to a lower federal court two challenges to two Indiana laws — one signed in 2016 by then-Gov. Mike Pence, that required an ultrasound and an 18-hour waiting period before an abortion and another that requires minors to obtain parental consent before the procedure.

"The liberal justices said courts have to balance burdens versus benefits when ruling on abortion laws," explained Mary Ziegler, a law professor at Florida State University. "Roberts said he didn’t agree, that a law could be completely pointless, but as long as it’s not burdensome it can be constitutional. That departs significantly from the precedent inand means courts going forward could be more likely to side with the government.

The Louisiana case dealt with another issue — legal standing for abortion providers, who regularly lead challenges to state restrictions on the procedure. Roberts agreed with the court's four liberal justices to find the clinics had standing, but his four conservative colleagues said they would have denied standing, effectively invalidating the lawsuit and potentially dozens like it nationwide.

The justices spent an unusually long time deciding whether to take up the Indiana law. In May 2019, they issued a decision addressingwithout first holding oral arguments. The court upheld a requirement for fetal remains from abortions to be buried or cremated rather than disposed of as medical waste, but it blocked another provision that would have banned abortions based on a fetus' sex, race or disability.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

With all of America's problems, rehashing Roe vs Wade is a big waste of time and tax payers' money. We have the HIPAA law, that should protect the patient-doctor privacy. The GOP only care about fetuses, but afterwards don't ask for food, healthcare or education for the kids.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 381. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Barbra Streisand, Sara Bareilles & More Singers React to SCOTUS Striking Down Louisiana Abortion LawThe Supreme Court struck down Louisiana&39;s abortion law on Monday (June 29) that would&39;ve nearly shut down every clinic in the state in a 5-4 ruling. Bareilles underrated af singer iamaktheking to the world 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Source: billboard - 🏆 112. / 63 Read more »

Advocates React to Supreme Court Abortion Ruling - Women’s Media CenterThe case was decided by a thin margin and demonstrates the need for Congress to pass the Women’s Health Protection Act, the proposed federal legislation that would protect a woman’s right to choose. Abortion is quickly becoming extinct, because a lot of people are praying the Rosary to end abortion. All religions were updated with the religion of Islam, it is the last religion the Lord sent to all human beings through the Prophet Muhammad and the rest of the religions are considered expired, so the Lord does not accept The Lord said: Whoever brings me a debt other than Islam? I will not accept it from him, therefore I invite you to Islam and follow the Prophet Muhammad
Source: womensmediacntr - 🏆 397. / 53 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs abortion clinic protest zone challengesThe U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday left in place policies in Chicago and Pennsylvania's capital Harrisburg that place limits on anti-abortion activists gathered outside abortion clinics. EXCELLENT!!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court tosses rulings blocking Indiana abortion curbsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday gave Indiana a second chance to revive two restrictive abortion laws - one imposing an ultrasound requirement and the other expanding parental notification when minors seek abortions - by throwing out a lower court's rulings blocking them. Here we go -- after blocking Louisiana's anti-abortion law, SCOTUS allowed Indiana to write enhanced anti-abortion law. Very consistent... More triple negatives, please. Who wrote this headline?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Where do abortion rights stand after Supreme Court ruling?The Supreme Court knocked down a Louisiana law that would have limited the number of abortion providers in the state. What does the decision mean for the future of Roe v. Wade? Ok we get it....The left hate and murder babies...point made already He said, 'Be Fruitful and Grow'! Like we don't even CARE who made Life! Mas LISTEN to! Murdering Babies is not a right
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

High court won't hear abortion clinic 'buffer zone' casesThe Supreme Court on Thursday turned away pleas from anti-abortion activists to make it easier for them to protest outside clinics, declining to wade back into the abortion debate just days after striking down a Louisiana law regulating abortion clinics. The justices said in a written order that they
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »