to allow the Texas law, which relies on citizen lawsuits to enforce it, to take effect in the first place.
The Supreme Court had never before even agreed to hear a case over a pre-viability abortion ban. But after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death last year and her replacement by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the third of Trump's appointees, the court said it would take up the case. “A decision upholding this ban is tantamount to overruling Roe. The ban prohibits abortion around two months before viability,” said Julie Rikelman, who will argue the case for the clinic.
This court appears far more conservative than the one that decided Casey, and legal historian Mary Ziegler at Florida State University’s law school, said the court probably would “overrule Roe or set us on a path to doing so.”
This makes me so angry! This issue was resolved years ago in Roe vs. Wade! Why do you keep trying to mess with it? Who is going to raise all of the unwanted children if you take this right away from women? Don’t we have enough kids being ruined in foster care as it is?
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court set to take up all-or-nothing abortion fightBoth sides are telling the Supreme Court there's no middle ground in Wednesday's showdown over abortion. The justices can either reaffirm the constitutional right to an abortion or wipe it away altogether. If the Supreme Court votes to ban abortion they will be voting against almost 70% of what the public believe is a woman's right to privacy, autonomy, and without coercion or outside interferance. There’s going to be an uptick in metal coat hanger sales. What the SCOTUS will ultimately decide is whether women have access to safe abortions. Changing the laws won't stop women from seeking abortions. Forcing women to have kids, they don't want creates maladjusted kids. We already have enough of that.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Can former Scientologists take the church to court? Or are religious tribunals the only recourse?Danny Masterson's case has refocused attention on religious arbitration, in which disputes are settled outside of courts, with little or no public scrutiny. --- I Question The Intelligence And Desparation Of Anyone Falling For These Ridiculous Cult Like Religious Scams --- Who Is That Stupid ? Obrigado pelo apoio. que sirva de exemplo pro mundo. abraços
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
A California court temporarily blocked a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for prison workers that was opposed by Gov. Gavin NewsomAn appeals court in California on Friday temporarily halted a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for prison workers in the state that was slated to take place next month.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court set to take up all-or-nothing abortion fightBoth sides are telling the Supreme Court there's no middle ground in Wednesday's showdown over abortion. The justices can either reaffirm the constitutional right to an abortion or wipe it away altogether. If the Supreme Court votes to ban abortion they will be voting against almost 70% of what the public believe is a woman's right to privacy, autonomy, and without coercion or outside interferance. There’s going to be an uptick in metal coat hanger sales. What the SCOTUS will ultimately decide is whether women have access to safe abortions. Changing the laws won't stop women from seeking abortions. Forcing women to have kids, they don't want creates maladjusted kids. We already have enough of that.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »