Supreme Court Rejects Adding Census Citizenship Question

  • 📰 TheOnion
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 17 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Supreme Court Rejects Adding Census Citizenship Question WhatDoYouThink?

In a blow to the Trump administration, the Supreme Court ruled that there was no reasonable rationale put forth for adding a citizenship question to the U.S.

Census, a move that many have argued has a racially and politically discriminatory motive. What do“Thank god, I’d be way too mortified to admit I’m a citizen of the United States right now.”“They’ll just have to go with their plan B and just assume everyone with a weird name is foreign.”Benedict Washington • Loudspeaker Assembler

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

my citizenship is now causing stress hives

Same.

Sickens me to hear people not proud to be Americans, so lea e if you have issues. Its not all Trump, its you stupidity and lack of tolerance for other people's views. You're 'embarrased', leave a d do not come back!

Nice!

Are they trying to assume my citizenship

Where's the satire

I just pretend to be Canadian, eh.

She's my fav.

Once again, is not fiction....

You would think that is a very important question.

What am I. In Oregon I can vote, but do I count in the Federal election?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 724. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg's journey from child of immigrants to the Supreme CourtJustice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the second woman in U.S. history to sit on the Supreme Court. Her road to the highest seat in the land was not an easy one. Despite being the top of her graduating class at Columbia, she still struggled to get her first job. MakeIt We need to have an age limit MakeIt Is she a Dreamer MakeIt Our values are not the same a 90 year old woman—they just aren’t. So where’s my representative on the bench
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Roberts' Supreme Court defies easy political labelsJust hours after Chief Justice John Roberts handed Republicans a huge victory that protects even the most extreme partisan electoral districts from federal court challenge, critics blasted him as worthy of being impeached, a politician who should run for office and a traitor. What good is a high court IMPEACH HIM
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court with Roberts in charge: conservative, but not always predictableThe Supreme Court did not move aggressively to the right, as many Democrats and liberal activists feared and many abortion foes had fervently hoped, writes DavidGSavage. DavidGSavage Give it time, Clarence and Sammy are both about to hit their 70s Stride DavidGSavage Right, of course. What did people expect? What do they think they will change? All the hysteria is useless, this is why there are three branches. It’s really simple civics. They just destroyed democracy by authorizing partisan gerrymandering. Why are you calling this court moderate?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

NC redistricting fight turns to state courts after rulingNow that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled federal courts aren't the place to settle partisan gerrymandering disputes, opponents of North Carolina's district maps are putting their hopes in state courts. We should redraw the map us vs them gerrymandering is BULL CRAP and every lying slithering weasel Repub knows it too Only way to counter it is to move in droves and turn this around. It is the only way fast enough to do it. You're welcome, democracy.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Was ‘Bridgegate’ Criminal, or Just Dirty Politics?By agreeing to hear the New Jersey case about traffic as political payback, the Supreme Court might be aiming to limit prosecutors’ ability to bring charges against officials without clear bribery or kickback schemes, experts say. Criminally dirty politics works for me. Narrowing the definition of public corruption is the OPPOSITE of what needs to happen, and WallStreet Suits KNOW it. Conscienceless portfolios increase Trump’s base from 20-odd% of WhiteSupremacists to 40-odd% Supremacists + Amoral Greedy. OccupyWallStreet justicedems ewarren It’s both. Next?
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »