Supreme Court Questions Government Bid to Avoid Paying Insurers Under Affordable Care Act

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 16 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

A majority of Supreme Court justices questioned whether the federal government could avoid paying billions of dollars to health insurers that sold consumer policies on exchanges created by the Affordable Care Act

WASHINGTON—A majority of Supreme Court justices questioned whether the federal government could avoid an obligation to pay billions of dollars to health insurers that sold consumer policies on exchanges created by the Affordable Care Act.

During an hourlong oral argument Tuesday, most of the justices seemed skeptical about the Justice Department’s arguments that the government didn’t have to pay roughly $12 billion. The money wasn’t owed, the department said, because lawmakers made changes to a program under the ACA called...

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

SC aided and abetted and colluded with the corrupt Congress to rule that the ACA could go forward. Now they have to rule on re-imbursements for an illegal law called the ACA that they allowed to become law. Roberts is/ was a disgrace when he promoted this legislation. Shame!

This is a little late. GOP& Trump already sabotaged ACA by threatening not to pay subsidies established in ACA. Effectively disrupted the insurance marketplace

Make the DNC pay.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court lets Kentucky abortion ultrasound law standA contested Kentucky law requiring a physician to display and describe a fetal ultrasound to patients seeking abortions has survived an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Without explanation or notable dissent, the justices declined to take up the case brought by a Kentucky abortion provider, EMW Women
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Arizona opioid case against Purdue, Sackler familyThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a novel case by Arizona seeking to ... Poor people deserve to die Painfree. I know it’s not what people want to hear, but, if you’re going to kill a person for being poor, you should probably allow them to die painlessly. Best SCOTUS money can buy. of course they did. bet I can count the pros/cons
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects challenge to Kentucky abortion ultrasound lawThe Supreme Court rejects a challenge to a Kentucky law requiring doctors to describe and share audio from ultrasound to abortion seekers For some, the less they know the better. Being informed gives you power to make decisions and provides options. This has nothing to do with the sanctity of life & everything to do w/judgement & power. At the same time Rs r fighting against abortion, they r taking school lunches from kids & throwing ppl off SNAP. I'll say it again: this is abt judgement & power. It has nothing to do w/life. And how did Kavanaugh vote?
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court: Kentucky abortion ultrasound law to be left in placeAbortionIsMurder Outstanding news 😊. See the fetal images and hear the fetal heartbeat. Informed consent. This is good news.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rejects challenge to Berkeley cell phone lawThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a free speech challenge brought by a t...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court leaves in place Kentucky abortion law mandating ultrasoundsDoctors must perform ultrasounds and have women listen to fetal heartbeats before performing abortions. Well if you're going to be a murderer you might as well listen to what you're killing. Makes sense to me. This is bull$hit! 🤬 I'm an avidly Pro-life healthcare worker but this goes against a patient's rights.
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »