For media professionals who cover the U.S. Supreme Court, there's an important lesson taught on the first day: It's best not to predict the outcome of cases based solely on oral arguments.
, the justices weren't exactly ambiguous about their intentions this morning in a case that may prove to be one of the most important in a generation. At issue is a law created by Mississippi Republicans, which banned abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. In, the district court and 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state statute is unconstitutional under theThis morning, the Supreme Court's dominant conservative majority seemed indifferent, if not overtly hostile, toward that precedent.
Kavanaugh, of Donald Trump's three appointees, was of particular interest because he seemed to argue that overturning Roe, and allowing states to make individual decisions on reproductive rights, reflected some kind of middle ground.
MaddowBlog What will they gain taking a woman’s right to choose away? This will cost the GOP in ways they can’t imagine.
MaddowBlog It’s going to be a 5-4 decision overturning RvW with Roberts voting with the liberal side so to not look like it’s political. Sotomayor is correct in pointing out that the only reason why RvW is being challenged now because it’s a 6-3 conservative court. Shameful.
MaddowBlog A rapist should not make decisions of women bodies.
MaddowBlog There’s an answer Biden must assign more justices to save democracy
MaddowBlog It’s toast
MaddowBlog To embrace murder in the womb is not a civil right. This is not 1973 when women were forced to keep their children. Medical advances today confirm that 15 weeks that fetus is full developed. Regardless of that we hear silly arguments about pro choice or pro life. Murder is Murder
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Crowds gather outside Supreme Court as future of Roe v. Wade on the lineProtesters on both sides of the abortion rights argument demonstrated outside of the Supreme Court as the justices heard oral arguments in a Mississippi abortion case that would ban most abortions in the state after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Read more:
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Poll: As Supreme Court hears Mississippi case, just 24 percent of Americans want Roe v. Wade overturnedAs the Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority seems poised to uphold a Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, more than twice as many Americans (55 percent) say they want the court to reaffirm its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision as say they want it overturned (24 percent), according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll. Its amusing how hardcore Republicans think their views are widely held amongst everyone else. The fact is there are 12M more registered Ds than Rs and the main way R politicians have gotten around losing is gerrymandering the hell out of their states.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
I'm Still Optimistic About Abortion Rights — Even As the Supreme Court Argues Roe v. Wade'The stakes are high, but so are the energy and dedication of a rising, diverse generation of people leading our movement and running for office.' - mintimm, the President of NARAL, on why she remains hopeful about the future of abortion rights. OpEd NARAL mintimm No Sperm = No Abortion I am ready to march!
Source: TeenVogue - 🏆 481. / 51 Read more »
Sotomayor suggests Supreme Court won't 'survive the stench' of overturning Roe v. Wade“Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts? I don’t see how it is possible,' Justice Sotomayor said. Is it even worth salvaging without massive change? I mean it doesn’t represent America at all The republican party won't either. But go ahead GOP shake that hornets nest. Partisan Scotus shows destruction on the highest court in America. No need to send cases when decisions are pre decided. Needs to be law that sitting president can only appoint 1-2 judges for their term(s). LeaderMcConnell ruined Supreme Court by denying Obama appointment
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Today's Supreme Court Case Makes It Clear: Amy Coney Barrett Will Decide the Future of Abortion Rights in the United StatesThat, to put it mildly, is not good news for the future of abortion rights Based Barrett. I’m not so sure it won’t be a 6-3 vote. nothing quite like a justice with crazy eyes.
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »