Supreme Court Backs Police in Two ‘Qualified Immunity’ Cases

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 38 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The U.S. Supreme Court threw out two separate excessive-force lawsuits filed against police, ruling that the doctrine of qualified immunity protected the officers from having to answer the allegations in court

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court threw out two separate excessive-force lawsuits filed against police, ruling Monday that the doctrine of qualified immunity protected the officers from having to answer the allegations in court.

At the scene, the suspect, Ramon Cortesluna, initially complied with police commands, the court said, citing undisputed facts from the case. But when he disregarded police instructions and lowered his hands, an officer who saw a knife in Mr. Cortesluna’s pocket, shot him with a nonlethal beanbag shotgun.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in San Francisco, reinstated the suit, reasoning that under similar circumstances it had permitted a claim to proceed. Both that prior suit “and this case involve suspects who were lying facedown on the ground and were not resisting either physically or verbally, on whose back the defendant officer leaned with a knee, causing allegedly significant injury,” the Ninth Circuit said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

I ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʟᴏꜱᴛ ꜱᴏ ᴍᴜᴄʜ ʙɪᴛᴄᴏɪɴ ᴛᴏ ꜰʀᴀᴜᴅꜱ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴘʀᴏᴍɪꜱᴇᴅ ɴᴏᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴛʀᴜꜱᴛ ᴀɴʏ ʙɪᴛᴄᴏɪɴ ᴘʟᴀᴛꜰᴏʀᴍ aɢᴀɪɴ ᴜɴᴛɪʟ ɪ ᴄᴀᴍᴇ ᴀᴄʀᴏꜱꜱ ᴛʜɪꜱ Trade Manager _Ambreymarcus, he helped me recover back all my lost funds now am debt free..

the time to end qualified immunity was a long time ago. Police officers' testimony shouldn't be admissible in court - too many officers caught lying too many times, too many officers caught abusing their authority too many times SpeakerPelosi SenSchumer POTUS KamalaHarris

About time!

This will cause misdirected anger towards the Supreme Court. Their job is to interpret the law. Lawmakers create the laws.

This is not a real doctrine. It is made up

Man we are in serious trouble

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Backs Qualified Immunity For Cops Accused Of Excessive ForceI'm a British-born reporter covering breaking news for Forbes. Reach me: jmcevoyforbes.com Surprise. Not. Explain this to me like I'm a 5th grader. ... When it is proven, and without a doubt, that a police officer used unnecessary and excessive force....they/he/she is above the law? Does that sound about right. No, I mean, does THAT sound right?
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court sides with police officers seeking 'qualified immunity' in two use-of-force casesPolice-reform advocates have called for an end to qualified immunity, arguing it insulates officers from accountability for wrongdoing.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court rules for police in two lawsuits claiming excessive forceUS Supreme Court rules that police officers in two cases should be shielded from lawsuits claiming their conduct killed one man and injured another. Agreed, police officers aren't trained properly and it varies from state to state. Roads are different, weather is different, and people are different. So we can't call police criminals, they defend the constitution still. I just believe that police should be appointed by mayors. The Supreme Court is illegitimate. The decisions are ideological, not legal. The police are court officers and the American justice system is incapable of fairly judging itself.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court again protects police accused of excessive forceThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday granted requests by police officers in separate cases from California and Oklahoma for legal protection under a doctrine called 'qualified immunity' from lawsuits accusing them of using excessive force. The justices overturned a lower court's decision allowing a trial in a lawsuit against officers Josh Girdner and Brandon Vick over the fatal shooting of a hammer-wielding man in Tahlequah, Oklahoma. jeffgoldesq 👎 Danger
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Justice Department asks Supreme Court to block Texas' 6-week abortion banThe Justice Department formally asked the Supreme Court Monday to step in and block a controversial Texas law that bars most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy while legal challenges play out. Isn't that personal freedom? Beautiful country is free every day. .. . THERE WAS A villain mlk new and said OK to villan he is the black races Enemy and orders molests rapes tortures murders AND WHEN THERES A talented black child he orders their off IF he had said no to villain THAT villain WOULD BECOME DECOY AND A MILLION INNOCENT lives saved Yeah right, they already gave them green light to enact it..
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Opinion | Supreme Court term limits wouldn’t solve anythingLifetime tenure is a strength of the high court. Ending that would do more harm than good. The SCOTUS lost legitimacy when 3 seats were stolen and autocrat enablers installed. Time to play hardball POTUS Hot take from a Bezos owned news outlet talking about how reforming a corporation friendly Supreme Court wouldn't solve anything
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »