enabling municipalities to roust, fine or even incarcerate homeless people without offering them anywhere to go, might as well suffice.Trump appointee Justice Neil Gorsuch’s decision leans rather heavily on an amicus brief submitted by San Francisco. The San Francisco officials who submitted that amicus brief buttressing Gorsuch’s opinion will have to come to terms with what they have done. So will others.
Following today’s ruling, there’s a lot less legal standing to hold San Francisco to its “compassionate” and “service-first” policies. And less “liberal” municipalities, which don’t even deign to claim such policies, let alonethem, can essentially crack the whip and drive their homeless populations to places that do. Like here.
It was transcendently stupid to claim that a December 2022 injunction led to this city becoming overrun with vagrants and tents. San Francisco has had a homeless problem. In 2020, years before that injunction, things got so bad in the heart of the city that San Francisco was forced toremoval of tents from the streets following that injunction only reveals just how transcendently stupid that moment was. And dishonest. Don’t forget the dishonesty.
Gorsuch — and, by extension, Breed — would have you believe that San Francisco is powerless to prevent every man, woman and child from asphyxiating in a swamp of needles and feces. But, again, it ain’t necessarily so: Yes, the 2022 injunction specifically did not allow cops tostreet dwellers with four sections of the penal code and two sections of the police code regarding, among other matters, public lodging or sitting on the sidewalk.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »
Source: KPIXtv - 🏆 443. / 53 Read more »
Source: KTVU - 🏆 465. / 53 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Source: SAcurrent - 🏆 607. / 51 Read more »
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »