Republican Senators Make Goonish Threat Against Major League Baseball

Speak up for voting rights, and the antitrust exemption gets it.

4/15/2021 1:17:00 PM

If Republicans want to be treated as a normal party that isn’t a threat to democracy, they should stop threatening democracy. jonathanchait writes

Speak up for voting rights, and the antitrust exemption gets it.

Yesterday, Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and Josh Hawley proposed to end Major League Baseball’s 99-year-old antitrust exemption. Cruz described their measure as merely one blow against a larger threat Cruz called “the Woke Corporation.”It’s easy to understand why Republicans feel betrayed and disrespected by the spectacle of large corporations opposing what is, at the moment, their party’s central objective. What’s difficult to understand is the philosophical basis for their position.

Restaurant owner makes big offer to lure workers - CNN Video Joy Reid: The GOP is obsessed with lying about critical race theory Bodies of Covid-19 victims are still stored in refrigerated trucks in NYC

Corporations are speaking out against voting restrictions for a combination of ethical and self-interested reasons. Some business leaders genuinely believe in expanding political participation. Others are responding to the demands of their customers and employees, both of which skew demographically to the left of the electorate (and far to the left of the political system, which overrepresents white rural constituents.)

Obviously this isn’t going to please Republicans. But on what basis can they claim it’s unfair?Republicans have long stood for the position that corporations are entitled to extremely broad deference to engage in free speech. They generally apply this principle to the issue of campaign-finance regulation, but — to hear Republicans tell it — their passion for unlimited and undisclosed donations is merely a consequence of their deeper passion for the First Amendment. headtopics.com

Cruz in particular has long staked out a vocal stance on this principle. “To hear the Democrats tell it, all they want to do is stop ‘corporate influences’ from unfairly influencing the political debate,” he explained, before proceeding to warn that any limitation on corporate political influence would lead to a dystopian regime of government censorship. “I believe in free speech and the First Amendment, which means everyone here has a right to speak out in politics as effectively as possible. To speak out and make your views known, whether that is standing on a street corner on a soap box, whether that is printing out a yard sign, whether that is spending money to run a radio ad or a TV ad, effectively communicating,” he insisted at another point.

All that hooey about standing up on a soap box and expressing your opinion is just cover for permitting unlimited donations. The “free speech” principle applies to money, but not to actual speech.National Review’s Dan McLaughlin attempts to identify a principled basis for the Republican complaints. The unfairness, he claims, is that these corporations are being extorted by Democrats:

The president, and his party’s lawyer, are urging multiple major corporations to combine to restrain trade for the purpose of making it harder for its political opposition to win elections, and using lies to restrict the president’s democratically elected critics from passing laws. If we saw this in another country, we would recognize it as a menacing step.

It certainly would be menacing if the president was threatening adverse consequences to firms that refuse to support his position. But McLaughlin cites zero instances of any Democrats threatening adverse policy steps against corporations that oppose them. headtopics.com

Beyond India, a growing number of Asian countries are engulfed by fresh coronavirus waves IHOP turned away Adam Sandler. Now it's trying to make it up to him Paul Van Doren, co-founder of Vans shoes, dead at 90

Indeed, the only elected officials threatening corporations are Republican politicians. Mitch McConnell warned of “serious consequences” for firms that take pro-voting-access positions. That sounds rather menacing! Meanwhile, here is a trio of Republicans senators proposing a bill that is explicitly designed to punish a company because it opposes the Republican line.

At their press conference yesterday, the Republican senators toggled back and forth between incompatible explanations for why they were introducing a bill to eliminate Major League Baseball’s antitrust exemption. On the one hand, they insisted the exemption was simply unjustified. (Obviously, they’re not going to describe their own proposal as bad policy.) On the other hand, they openly described their bill as retribution for the league’s pro-voting-access stance.

The bill “underscores that there’s no reason Major League Baseball should enjoy special subsidies, corporate welfare no one else gets,” explained Cruz, “If they’re gonna play partisan enforcer, they shouldn’t see special goodies from Washington when they are dishonestly acting to favor one party over another.” The implication is that if they’re not going to play partisan enforcer, they should get special goodies from Washington.

Likewise, Hawley told reporters, “This is a league that wants to exert political influence, and at the same time, wants to get government handouts and government subsidies. They just can’t have it both ways.” Hawley’s public stance is that they can either get what he calls “government hand-outs and government subsidies” or they can “exert political influence.” They can’t have it both ways, though. If they get out of the Republicans’ way on voting rights, they can continue to enjoy what Hawley deems to be unjustified corporate welfare. headtopics.com

Read more: New York Magazine »

Woodland burials offer an eco-friendly death

A growing number of people are choosing a 'natural' or 'green burial,' where a body is laid to rest without harming the environment.

BlueTidalWave jonathanchait Can someone please give me a legitimate explanation why Trump and all of his Republican seditionists in Congress are not under arrest right now? My elected representatives never answer HouseDemocrats SenateDems SpeakerPelosi RepValDemings SenSchumer cnnbrk MSNBC jonathanchait Whose democracy do you mean? At home or abroad? Because for foreign countries ‘democracy’ is America’s deadliest export product, next to ‘human rights’. There’s no country on earth abusing these concepts the way the US has been doing over the last century.

LindaMi14118735 jonathanchait eatingtrumpshitcausesbraindamage jonathanchait The GOP does not want to be treated like a normal political party. They want to end democracy in the U.S. and confer permanent minority rule upon themselves. jonathanchait Don't forget 147 Republicans voted to overturn our election and they also don't care about the insurrection.