Perspective: Nothing has changed in more than a century.
Nothing has changed in more than a century.
The decision highlighted the complex economic, political and cultural relationship between the U.S. government and American territories. U.S. policy, as Justice Neil M. Gorsuch noted in his concurring opinion, has too often rested “on ugly racial stereotypes” predicated on exploitation of island residents in the mold of European colonial powers, instead of American constitutional ideals.
Yet, while we take for granted that Caribbean islands such as Puerto Rico, St. Thomas, St. Croix and St. John are U.S. territory, their role within an American empire has since the start sparked fierce debates. One of the earliest examples of this came when the Lincoln administration attempted to annex what decades later became the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Cycling from Paris to Doha to watch France at Qatar 2022 | CNN
Traveling to watch their team play at the World Cup took a little longer than usual for two French fans. Read more >>
On a sidenote, TaylorLorenz is one of the worst & unethical journalists in the business. You keeping her on staff reflects the same for your image. I hope having the equivalent of a psycho ex-girlfriend on your staff is worth the damage to your reputation.
Puerto Ricans Speak Out on US Territory's Political StatusHundreds of Puerto Ricans have crowded into a convention center where federal legislators are holding a public hearing to decide the future of the island’s political status as the U.S. territory struggles to recover from hurricanes, earthquakes and a deep economic crisis. Make this territory a state already — and while we are at it, make DC a state too. 🤣😂🤣 HispanicFedPR HispanicFed They should have their independence!
Older Canadians are having more sex — and it's really good. So why does it bother us so much?Older Canadians are having more sex — and it's really good. So why does it bother us so much? — via healthing_ca healthnews
WTI backs off from three-month highs near $121, but still well supported amid recent bullish developmentsHaving at one point come within a whisker of hitting the $121 per barrel mark earlier in the day and, in doing, having hit fresh three-month highs, fr
The passion in living, working and changingA few weeks ago, I wrote about having a sense that the financial world was changing.
Editorial: Gun rights, gun regulations not contradictoryThere’s no inherent contradiction between citizens having the right to own firearms and the government having the right and responsibility to enact laws regulating private gun ownership, our Editorial Board writes. Your editorial board sucks. -Texan, San Antonio. The people who seek to ban common people from owning weapons...lets put it this way .Obama and Bush both joked this would be easier in a dictatorship . Biden thinks Oligarchy is the future..keep your guns.youllneed them
Used book sale, discount movies, horses, unicorns and more cheap, free things to do in DenverUsed book sale, discounted movies, horses, unicorns and more cheap deals in Colorado this June (via thknwco)
ArrowRight The decision highlighted the complex economic, political and cultural relationship between the U.Photos: Queen Elizabeth II's Platinum Jubilee “Democracy is not always pretty, but it’s necessary,” said Rep.Studies indicate exercise may help improve the the links in the nervous system between separate brain areas, improving brain health.Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
S. government and American territories.S. U. That’s not to say it’s all contented sighs and afterglow.S.S. policy, as Justice Neil M. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress.
Gorsuch noted in his concurring opinion, has too often rested “on ugly racial stereotypes” predicated on exploitation of island residents in the mold of European colonial powers, instead of American constitutional ideals. The proposal of a binding plebiscite — a measure that has not yet been introduced in committee — has frustrated some on an island that already has held seven unilateral, nonbinding referendums on its political status, with no overwhelming majority emerging. The need for closeness doesn’t go away as we get older It’s no secret our population is aging , with the oldest baby boomers around 75 who came of age around the sexual revolution, and are more open to conversations related to their sex lives. Yet, while we take for granted that Caribbean islands such as Puerto Rico, St. Thomas, St. Luis Herrero, a political consultant, said during the hearing that even if enough people support statehood, there are not enough votes in the Senate to make Puerto Rico a state: “Not today, not yesterday, not tomorrow. Croix and St. As — puts it: “Sex doesn’t disappear, it just changes form. John are U.” Saturday's hearing comes amid ongoing discontent with Puerto Rico’s current political status, with the U. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet.
S. territory, their role within an American empire has since the start sparked fierce debates. Supreme Court further angering many in April after upholding the differential treatment of residents of Puerto Rico. ADVERTISEMENT Advertisement “That’s not just for older people,” says Natalie Rosen, associate professor, department of psychology and neuroscience, Dalhousie University, who generally counsels couples transitioning to parenthood but is also a practising sex therapist and teaches human sexuality. One of the earliest examples of this came when the Lincoln administration attempted to annex what decades later became the U.S. As a result, many of those who spoke at Saturday’s public hearing welcomed the proposed binding plebiscite. Virgin Islands. It might look more like foreplay — more turn taking, more breaks, different positions. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended to be investment advice.
Advertisement As the Civil War was coming to an end in 1865, new expansionist possibilities in the Caribbean emerged.S. The strengthened and growing American empire saw opportunities to establish a naval base on St. Thomas after Denmark’s hold over its West Indian “possessions” had been weakened by an 1864 military defeat at the hands of Otto von Bismarck and allies. “Even after all our service and sacrifice, we come back home and we are denied full voting rights and equality. But again, not without issues. In addition to providing military advantages to the United States, Secretary of State William Seward believed that the benefits of a St. Thomas coaling station would trickle down to the islands’ inhabitants..
In Seward’s view, bringing St. There’s also evidence that a good chunk of men get one prescription and never refill it. Thomas into the “domain of the United States” would increase the residents’ access to American markets, protect their property and give them the same advantages “enjoyed by other citizens. We cannot vote for our president, our commander in chief, (but) they send us to war.” And so, on Jan. 7, 1865, Seward attended a Washington dinner at which he met with the Danish envoy, Waldemar Raasloff, to discuss a confidential proposition for the purchase of St. He said he hopes it will go to the House floor by August. “[They] can still be interested in having sex but issues of privacy, consent, societal stigma — where we don’t want to think or talk about older adults still having sex — can lead to a culture of don’t ask, don’t tell,” says Rosen. Thomas.
However, the shock of Abraham Lincoln’s assassination on April 14, 1865, and the attempt at Seward’s life that same evening considerably delayed negotiations. 5, 2023. When he returned to politics, Seward became politically tied to Lincoln’s successor, Andrew Johnson, and by extension, involved in a battle with the Republican-controlled Congress that centered on federal Reconstruction policies. According to Health Canada, since the early 2000s, STI rates for those 60 and older have increased significantly , with a five per cent increase in syphilis, an 87 per cent rise in gonorrhea, and a whopping 142 increase in chlamydia. Advertisement Seward, however, continued his work on Caribbean expansion and traveled to St.S. Thomas and several other West Indian islands in January 1866. By summer, the secretary of state was ready to make an offer to Danish politicians for the purchase of St. “A solution to this problem of more than 120 years has to happen at some point,” he said. Why we are so reluctant to talk about older people having sex? Many physicians have closed or negative attitudes, are uncomfortable or ignorant when discussing safe sex with their senior patients, so they don’t often think of testing for infections.
Thomas, St. Croix and St.” NBCLX storyteller Bianca Graulau examines the history of the island’s unusual relationship with the U. John. ADVERTISEMENT Advertisement “Staff should have awareness and manage it in a sensitive way,” says Rosen. The Danish envoy had suggested $20 million as a minimum amount, but since the islands, according to American military officials, could just be taken by force, the small European state lacked leverage., and the statehood debate that has divided even Puerto Ricans. Seward, in turn, offered just “five millions of dollars of gold” and added that the negotiation had to be “by Treaty” and would “require the constitutional ratification of the Senate.
” After another round of negotiations, and Seward’s acquiescence to a referendum on the islands before annexation, the parties signed a treaty to transfer the islands of St.” Doctors can also be in a better position to assess for cognitive capacity for consent, she says. Thomas and St. John (St. Croix was strategically and commercially less important) to the United States in exchange for $7. Some homes deal with that by creating barriers which prevent the possibility of consensual intimate interaction.5 million in gold on Oct.
24, 1867. The treaty seemed to benefit everyone, even the local population, which voted overwhelmingly for American annexation. With the rapidly aging population, this conversation needs to be had, and it needs to be normalized. Denmark got an economic boost, a plebiscite precedent for transfer of territory that would help in regaining what became Northern Germany and an apparent foreign policy success. The United States got a Caribbean naval base, increased economic opportunity and an expanded population. Only congressional ratification remained.
Advertisement The Constitution gave the Senate the power to “advice and consent” on treaties, and figures such as Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Charles Sumner reasonably expected to be heard. Indeed, just a few months earlier, Sumner had expressed the wish that the Alaska purchase, in which a treaty had been negotiated without Senate consultation, would not set “a precedent.” While Johnson spoke warmly about the West Indian acquisition in his third annual presidential address to Congress on Dec. 3, 1867, domestic political tension escalated the next year, further undermining congressional support for ratification. On Feb.
21, 1868, three days before the deadline for ratifying the St. Thomas treaty, Johnson removed Secretary of War Edwin Stanton from office. Shortly thereafter, between Feb. 29 and March 3, 1868, the House of Representatives reviewed and — for the first time in American history — adopted articles of impeachment against a sitting president. Though Johnson narrowly survived the impeachment proceedings, the trial swallowed almost all domestic political energy until the middle of May and left little, if any, room for discussions of the Danish-American treaty.
Still, Danish politicians and diplomats held out hope for ratification and devoted significant resources, albeit no bribes, to building support for the treaty in Congress. Danish envoys even commissioned a book, “The Danish Islands: Are We Bound in Honor to Pay for Them?” which opened with Lincoln and Seward initiating negotiations to purchase the Danish West Indies and a basic argument: American politicians had wanted to buy the islands, Denmark had reluctantly sold, now the only honorable course of action was to ratify the signed treaty. Advertisement Danish diplomats sensed that the honor argument resonated personally with Sumner, because it built on his 1867 point that “a bargain once made must be kept” in relation to Alaska. Danish efforts, however, proved futile despite meetings with high-ranking American officials and two appearances before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in early 1869. By then, support had vanished in the White House, too.
Newly inaugurated President Ulysses S. Grant considered the St. Thomas treaty a scheme of the previous administration and declined to support it, despite his own interest in West Indian annexation. The matter concluded in 1870. During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee meeting in March, Sumner argued against the imperialism inherent in visions of Caribbean expansion, which he saw as a distraction from efforts to bring constitutional civil rights to the Reconstruction South, and his committee reported the St.
Thomas treaty “adversely” to the Senate. Sumner’s decision officially put an end to the process as “the Senate declined to ratify it,” and a Grant administration treaty to acquire Santo Domingo suffered the same fate in June 1870. Still, the Republican Party’s support for territorial growth remained strong but for years was mostly limited to the American mainland — where its policy of land-taking was bolstered by several Homestead Acts after 1862. Advertisement In the wake of Seward’s failed attempt at noncontiguous expansion, St. Thomas, St.
John and St. Croix experienced decline, demographically and economically. High mortality rates, not least among children, were exacerbated by poor work conditions and lack of access to medical care. In October 1878, low wages, caused by a rigid contract labor system, led to widespread revolts among Black agricultural workers on St. Croix.
Danish authorities quelled the uprising, known as the Fireburn Strike, only through military force, which demonstrated their precarious hold over the islands. In the late 19th and early 20th century, when European powers such as Germany and France looked to gain Caribbean footholds, it renewed American interest in the region. After the Spanish-American War, which brought about the annexation of Puerto Rico (as well as Hawaii, Guam and the Philippines) in 1898, World War I provided the necessary additional impetus. By 1916, American emissaries and politicians, after hinting that St. Thomas, St.
John and St. Croix could just be taken by force, successfully negotiated a treaty that on March 31, 1917, transferred the islands to the United States. The political atmosphere in the country had changed enough that the Senate ratified the treaty. But while it settled that these Caribbean islands were American territory, it raised a whole new swath of questions about how to treat them — and their citizens. While much has changed over a century, the basic question of equal treatment for citizens in American territories has essentially remained the same.
The United States still hasn’t fully integrated the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico or many other noncontiguous territories. Consequently, these relationships, as evidenced by the recent Supreme Court decision, continue be more aligned with those of Old World colonial powers than with Seward’s ideal of similar advantages enjoyed by all citizens. Comment .