Justice Amy Coney Barrett bewails perceptions of Court partisanship at the center named after Mitch McConnell, who introduced her. She was not struck by lightning. Photo: Timothy D Easley/AP/Shutterstock On one level, I suppose, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett is as entitled as her senior colleague Stephen Breyer to talk sanctimoniously about the purity of heart that goes into every ruling and opinion by every member of that august bench.
It’s also relevant that Barrett accepted two lifetime appointments to the federal judiciary from former President Donald Trump, the great scofflaw, who was more nakedly political and transactional in his treatment of judicial nominations than any president in history.
ed_kilgore 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
ed_kilgore The lady doth protest too much methinks.
ed_kilgore Let's see. Complaints were the Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, & Barrett were picked to overturn Roe v Wade. And they did.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Amy Coney Barrett says Supreme Court justices aren't 'partisan hacks' amid Dem court-packing threats: reportSupreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett insisted Sunday that the court isn't as partisan an institution as many outside observers make it out to be, as Democrats continue to direct their ire at the tribunal after multiple favorable decisions for Republicans in recent weeks. Speeches fall on deaf ears. Only rulings and written decisions has meaning.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Justice Amy Coney Barrett argues Supreme Court isn't 'a bunch of partisan hacks'In the wake of a controversial decision on abortion rights, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett told a crowd of more than 100 here that she doesn't believe the highest court in the land is politically driven. both can be true, they are political (since judges are appointed by politicians because of their views) and also not political, because of rule of law / precedent / common law. Justice Barrett's statement is only partially true. In the case of the Texas abortion law it wasn't politically motivated. It was much worse. It was a ruling based on religion. When will you report real news? Do your job !!!
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Amy Coney Barrett says Supreme Court justices aren't 'partisan hacks'Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett argued Sunday that decisions by the high court aren't driven by political views and said she and her colleagues on the court are not a 'bunch of partisan hacks,' according to reports. The gift that keeps lying... Yeah, right! How does that explain why she always voted on the opposite end of Justice Ginsberg?
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme CourtSupreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett says justices must be 'hyper vigilant' about personal biases, fearing the court will be seen as partisan. She really has been a true disappointment. What can anybody expect from a McConnel recommendation Oh… That's rich coming from a Trump dump on the court.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Barrett Concerned Republican-Packed Supreme Court Seen As PartisanJustices must be “hyper vigilant to make sure they’re not letting personal biases creep into their decisions' she said Sunday. Trump chose her precisely for her personal bias. Like the other Republicans. Her words are meaningless. Thanks for giving one concerned white woman air time over the thousands in the future millions of desperate poor women faced with no choices
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme CourtJudges must be 'hyper vigilant' to keep personal biases out of their decisions, said Barrett, who would not comment on the court's vote not to block Texas' abortion ban. 🙄🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥 That’s because that’s what the partisan politicians in Congress tell them all the time. The reality is our courts aren’t partisan and do their jobs. It’s too bad those in Congress don’t do theirs! She's worried about politicization? She was introduced by Mitch McConnell at the McConnell Center. The reason she was appointed to the Supreme Court was to overturn Roe v. Wade. She is a political appointment whether she knows it or not. She's a Manchurian candidate.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »