. At the same time, in fields or organizations where women make up the majority, men can still experience a “glass escalator,” being fast-tracked to senior leadership roles. School superintendents, who work in the women-dominated field of education but are more likely to be men, are one example. To make sense of this, we conceptualized bias at work as a combination of both organizational biases that can be influenced by organizational makeup and larger societal biases.
What we found was that if societal biases are strong compared with those in the organization, a powerful but brief intervention may have only a short-term impact. In our simulation, we tested this by introducing quotas — requiring that the majority of promotions go to women — in the context of low, moderate, or no societal bias. We made the quotas time-limited, as real world efforts to combat bias often take the form of short-term interventions.
Our quotas changed the number of women at upper levels of the corporate hierarchy in the short term, and in turn decreased the gender biases against women rising through the company ranks. But when societal biases were still a persistent force, disparities eventually returned, and the impact of the intervention was short-lived.In the presence of societal biases, the effect of a short-term program of quotas disappears over time.Quotas are introduced. 70% of all promotions go to women.
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »
Source: voguemagazine - 🏆 715. / 51 Read more »