In both cases, the American president said only what many had already speculated. But saying the silent part out loud is serious stuff in diplomacy. It’s been clear for months now that Washington would prefer not to get entangled in a significant spat with Moscow. During their summit in Geneva this summer,, and later the news media, that as long as he doesn’t meddle as much, we can live with it.
This is unfortunately part of a broader, more detached approach to foreign crises that the White House has taken. The Kremlin took it as a major moment to move ahead with an ambitious attempt to assert more control over its neighbors. What should Biden have said? He needed to channel Winston Churchill: Describe in stark terms the gravity of our present predicament. The sovereignty of a nation’s borders is a fundamental principle of international law, and threats to breach them demands more than piling on a few more sanctions, which is the diplomatic equivalent of a slap on the wrist.
Biden should have looked past the reporters in the room and straight into the camera, speaking directly to Putin. The Russian leader needed to hear in no uncertain terms that we will use absolutely every asset and technique at our disposal to push his forces out of Ukraine. These include military, intelligence, economic, communications and diplomatic tools. Should he move in, we will massively increase military support to Ukraine, as well as other Russian neighbors.
Every week, the U.S. could release new intelligence about corruption and mismanagement at the Kremlin. Every week, we could increase distribution of Russian language materials on democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Every week, we could flood the internet with satiric content that punctures Putin’s propaganda.
BrettBruen THINK Ukraine is a sovereign nation, not an extension of Russia. Putin is not nostalgic; Ukraine has desirable resources: ports, the Black Sea, trade & strategic military locations. It's a buffer to Russia, & has economical value. Putin wants it. Wake up Biden.
BrettBruen THINK Why spend billions of dollars on NATO. The Cold War is over. But we spend billions expanding NATO and inviting other countries to join. Who wins — the defense contractors. Who lose and foot the bill: American tax payers that can even get good health insurance & infrastructure
BrettBruen THINK BrettBruen — u a war monger. So what about Russia places ballistic missiles and nuclear weapon in Cuba and are pointed to US. What will be the reaction?
THINK BidenWorstPresidentEver LetsGoBrandon
THINK Omg, do better Bruen
THINK Trump denied Putin kills journalists, assassinates dissidents, hacks foreign powers, interferes in elections. Then sided with Russia over US intelligence, gave them kompromat on himself, asked for their election interference, & lifted sanctions. But Biden's one sentence did us in
THINK Really? Save your opinion. If the NATO alliance is so flimsy that it can be shaken by questionable word choice, why didn't it fall apart during Donald's 'reign?'
THINK The Ukrainians are in an excellent strategic position. There's a chance for the Ukraine people if they can target the former nuclear facility at Chernobyl. That'd be great if the Russians attacked. And NATO would get just what they deserve!👍 This would be a good thing! Fallout!
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »