As Judge Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation hearing gets underway, Joe Biden still won’t say whether he supports adding Justices to the Supreme Court. Image: AP/Zuma Press Composite: Mark KellyThe intimidation game has begun. President Biden announced last Friday the formation of a commission on reforming the Supreme Court, and Democrats in the House and Senate responded on Wednesday by announcing that a bill to add four justices to the high court is forthcoming.
Progressives have long used threats to pressure the Supreme Court to back down from the Constitution. In 1906 President Theodore Roosevelt’s allies hinted that the court shouldn’t reject expansion of the Interstate Commerce Act. According to my colleague Thomas Merrill, the “implied threat” included the possibility of “stripping the Court of jurisdiction over ICC matters or creating a specialized court.
Such threats soon became standard practice. In 1909 commissioner Charles Prouty cautioned judges that if they questioned the ICC’s authority they would face popular protest that “would not stop until the Constitution itself had been so altered as to enable the people to deal properly with these public servants.” In 1912, running as the Progressive Party’s presidential nominee, Roosevelt campaigned on the recall of uncooperative judges and decisions. President Franklin D.
Progressives never had to carry out their threats to get what they wanted. All they had to do was encourage judges to consider the advantages of judicial “restraint” and “deference” to the political branches. Unnerved by the bullying, some Supreme Court justices lost their courage. By holding back from overturning popular legislation, they thought they could “save the Court.
opinion 2016 the WSJ ignored Republicans obstruction of judicial nomination, essentially packing by reducing & skewing the number of justices Rs have already intimidated & undermined judiciary & its independence
opinion Stop bullshitting WSJ! Stop it! What about the effort to overtly corrupt the Supreme Court? No answers yet as to how Kavanaugh’s debt and club memberships and whatnot were paid off! I am 10,000 miles away, but I can see through yr BS.
opinion The last Administration made sure this Court is now politicized.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Opinion | Congressional Democrats’ Court-Picking (Not Packing) SchemeFrom WSJopinion: Congress probably won’t pack the Supreme Court. But a court-picking provision poses a real threat to Americans' rights, writes Alan Gura. opinion yet more drivel from Murdoch land. opinion When the Republicans packed the Supreme Court, they did something much worse than court picking. opinion Wouldn’t more tax cuts for the rich fix this too?
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Democrats' court-packing push haunted by 2016 'We Need Nine' campaignThe Democratic push to expand the Supreme Court has led to opponents resurfacing Democrats' 'We Need Nine' campaign in support of then-Judge Merrick Garland's confirmation, which emphasized the need for nine justices on the high court.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Opinion | Why Democrats' court-packing plan will backfireAdding seats to the high court would formalize the body's transformation into a social issues super legislature to the detriment of the republic. THINK Oh, an opinion piece from Washington Examiner: everything Democrats do is wrong and will backfire. But everything Mitch has done on court packing for the last 2 decades is legitimate and righteous. Gimme a break. 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ THINK At the moment the US Supreme Court is a GOP club to last for 75 years and more..... Not a bad idea to want to add members (now that the Dems have SOME power) OR find a way to limit terms to, say, 20 years, than get some new judges in there. THINK Nah.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Opinion | How the Supreme Court Helped Create 'Driving While Black'Opinion: A reckoning with police violence must include a reckoning with how the nation’s highest court enabled it We need less “opinion” pieces in this world and more articles based on facts instead of subjective analysis Hard have justice with a corrupt system! What is JoeBiden doing about this ? Maybe it’s time for less speeches and more ACTION! Is it only White officers pulling over drivers of color? You also fail to mention that many of these driver’s own actions lead to the shooting. The most recent account was an accident and a tragedy but he also was responsible for creating the situation that lead to his death.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Opinion | The size of the court has always been a 'political hot potato'The argument that court expansion is unconstitutional is weak, transparently political — and most importantly, wrong. steve_vladeck Daily Anyone taking bets? Because if roles were reversed you know they would do exactly the same and more... steve_vladeck Daily REPUBLICANTS packed the Court just in the last 4 years. It's the Democrats turn. 🙂 steve_vladeck Daily
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »