President Biden, Biden Climate Plan, Net Zero Emissions, Carbon Footprint, Environmental Policy, Energy Policy, Mining, Climate Change, Green Energy, Global Warming

President Biden, Biden Climate Plan

Opinion | Biden’s Not-So-Clean Energy Transition

The International Energy Agency exposes the hidden environmental costs and infeasibility of going green.

5/13/2021 2:45:00 AM

From WSJopinion: The International Energy Agency exposes the hidden environmental costs and infeasibility of going green, writes MarkPMills

The International Energy Agency exposes the hidden environmental costs and infeasibility of going green.

ByMark P. MillsMay 11, 2021 12:58 pm ETThe International Energy Agency, the world’s pre-eminent source of energy information for governments, has entered the political debate over whether the U.S. should spend trillions of dollars to accelerate the energy transition favored by the Biden administration. You know, the plan to use far more “clean energy” and far less hydrocarbons—the oil, natural gas and coal that today supply 84% of global energy needs. The IEA’s 287-page

Blackpink Tease 5th Anniversary '4+1 Project' E3 Shocker: Nintendo Has Announced That ‘Breath Of The Wild 2’ Will Get Back To The Company’s Roots And Be A Vacuum Disturbing Facts Disney Would Never Want You To Know About Their Theme Parks

reportreleased this month, “The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions,” is devastating to those ambitions. A better title would have been: “Clean Energy Transitions: Not Soon, Not Easy and Not Clean.”The IEA assembled a large body of data about a central, and until now largely ignored, aspect of the energy transition: It requires mining industries and infrastructure that don’t exist. Wind, solar and battery technologies are built from an array of “energy transition minerals,” or ETMs, that must be mined and processed. The IEA finds that with a global energy transition like the one President Biden envisions, demand for key minerals such as lithium, graphite, nickel and rare-earth metals would explode, rising by 4,200%, 2,500%, 1,900% and 700%, respectively, by 2040.

The world doesn’t have the capacity to meet such demand. As the IEA observes, albeit in cautious bureaucratese, there are no plans to fund and build the necessary mines and refineries. The supply of ETMs is entirely aspirational. And if it were pursued at the quantities dictated by the goals of the energy transition, the world would face daunting environmental, economic and social challenges, along with geopolitical risks.

The IEA stipulates up front one underlying fact that advocates of a transition never mention: Green-energy machines use far more critical minerals than conventional-energy machines do. “A typical electric car requires six times the mineral inputs of a conventional car, and an onshore wind plant requires nine times more mineral resources than a gas-fired power plant,” the report says. “Since 2010, the average amount of minerals needed for a new unit of power generation capacity has increased by 50% as the share of renewables has risen.” That was merely to bring wind and solar to a 10% share of the world’s electricity.

As the IEA notes dryly, the transition is a “shift from a fuel-intensive to a material-intensive energy system.” That means a shift away from liquids and gases whose extraction and transport leave a very light footprint on the land and are transported easily, cheaply and efficiently, and toward big-footprint mines, the energy-intensive transport of massive amounts of rocks and other solid materials, and subsequent chemical processing and refining.

Read more: The Wall Street Journal »

Selena Gomez Gets Candid About Her Best (and Worst) Fashion Moments

Did you know she helped design some of her red carpet looks?

opinion MarkPMills Mark Mills opinion MarkPMills The author is a partner at a firm that works for the oil and gas industry. I mean c’mon could WSJ find anyone MORE biased to lie for them?

How Rich Countries Must Help Developing Economies Afford The Clean Energy TransitionIt's tough for rich countries to hit carbon neutrality. It's a much harder task for poorer countries. What then? Free Teslas

Inside Biden’s Plan To Create Over 10 Million Well-Paying Jobs With His Clean Energy InitiativeBiden’s primary goals are to improve and rebuild the nation’s deteriorating highways, bridges, tunnels, hospitals, airports, water systems, electricity grids and other important structures, while also saving the environment and creating millions of new jobs in the green and clean energy space. He will be create the wors recession I hear Trumps still in charge. And this thing is all a fake show. Its all about to be revealed. Wow!!! creating jobs in America and in friendly nations would be the best Global Initiative the US of A must take now.

'We owe this to our people': Lawmakers want answers on directed-energy attacksLawmakers were sworn to secrecy for 5 years about the threat of mysterious health incidents impacting U.S. personnel at home and abroad. Now, those lawmakers have hit their limit and are castigating the intelligence community. Hit Putin harder if this is Russia as suspected.

Elon Musk Says Tesla Suspends Accepting Bitcoin for Vehicle PurchasesElon Musk said Tesla has suspended taking bitcoin payments for its vehicles, saying the company would resume using the cryptocurrency for transactions “as soon as mining transitions to more sustainable energy” Probably he prefer wait until some government provide some subsidies. Now watch bitcoin go lower

Harris once opposed the border closure. As vice president, she supports it.Democrats, immigration advocates accuse Biden, Harris of keeping the border closed to limit immigration, not protect the country against the pandemic. 😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣 Aren't you guys tired of writing BS?!... isn't it normal for a Vice President to support a President policies?... The Vice President is supporting the President’s policies. Shocking😑

White House stays out of police protection debate as key Democrat says he's willing to compromiseWhite House press secretary Jen Psaki said Monday that the Biden administration would not “take a stance in the middle of negotiations” about abolishing qualified immunity.