In a case that could lead to a landmark ruling, the justices with the U.S. Supreme Court are looking at New York's century-old law regarding carrying a concealed weapon in public.
New York courts defined "proper cause" to require applicants to show a "special need" to defend themselves and not just wanted to protect themselves.
Finally people of the left-wing radical States. We'll get some protection:-)
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
New York passes landmark voting rights legislation - New York Amsterdam NewsNew York’s governor signed a law Monday intended to prevent local officials from enacting rules that might suppress people’s voting rights because of their race. The John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act, named after the late civil rights activist who [...]
Source: NYAmNews - 🏆 269. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court Rules Against New York's Gun Permit LawThe Supreme Court ruled against a New York law that restricts who can carry a firearm in public in a 6-3 decision that comes weeks after 19 children and two teachers were fatally shot in an Uvalde, Texas, school. The court decided whether denying a concealed-carry license for self-defense violated the Second Amendment. Supreme Court decisions in 2008 and 2010… Love it
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »
Live updates: Supreme Court strikes down New York's handgun lawThe Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York gun law that places restrictions on carrying a concealed gun outside the home. Follow here for live news updates, reactions and analysis. So the govt can change the 2nd amendment to fit what they want and not actually what is written? Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone can own any gun to do with as they choose! Has anyone in the govt done research on the constitution or has no one read it? Only an idiot would believe that banning guns would effect anyone but law abiding citizens who have a natural RIGHT to defend themselves. Learn something someday. Hint- stay away from nnc Of course they did. 😳May THEY feel the effects of their decisions next time a disillusioned, gun toting, extremist believes they must take matters into their own hands and not some poor unsuspecting SCHOOL KID just tryin to learn. I’m tired of the innocent paying the price!!
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Labor board takes Starbucks to court over alleged violations - New York Amsterdam NewsThe National Labor Relations Board is asking a federal court to order Starbucks to stop interfering with unionization efforts at its U.S. stores.
Source: NYAmNews - 🏆 269. / 63 Read more »
New body armor rules in NY miss vest worn by Buffalo killer - New York Amsterdam NewsNew York’s new law barring sales of bullet-resistant vests to most civilians doesn't cover the type of armor worn by the gunman who killed 10 people at a Buffalo supermarket, a gap that could limit its effectiveness in deterring future military-style assaults.
Source: NYAmNews - 🏆 269. / 63 Read more »
Bulldozer destroys dozens of illegal motorbikes as New York City mayor announces new safety planMayor Eric Adams gave a press conference at an auto pound in Brooklyn this week, as a bulldozer pulverized a pile of confiscated dirt bikes and ATVs behind him. What? This is weird. Cyclephob? This mayor has never been to Rome. Confiscation and destruction is his answer? Something else is going on. Bike crushing is just a ploy.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »