NATO will consider an attack against a member country's assets in space an assault on the alliance that could lead to a coordinated armed response from all members. That's according to its first formal public space policy released today.
It will consider an attack against a member country's space assets an assault on the alliance.
by the heads of member states last year, which said an attack against one member in space will be considered an attack against all.The new policy from NATO goes further and defines its key roles in space, including coordinating allies' space capabilities to help NATO's deterrence and defense efforts in other operational domains: land, maritime, air and cyberspace.
It includes a list of principles and tenets the alliance seeks to uphold in accordance with international law, including that the use of outer space for peaceful purposes is in the common interest of all nations and that no country can claim space as its own.Read more: Axios »
Lunar eclipse thrills stargazers
The eastern half of North America and all of Central and South America were treated to prime viewing of a lunar eclipse, while partial stages were visible ac... Read more >>
CarolYMorrisse1 Cool, cool but let’s not go to war over a satellite.
For all his faults, Donald Trump had the right idea about NATO | MulshineThe current kerfuffle over Ukraine's possible entrance into NATO shows why Donald Trump was right to want to extricate the U.S. from that Cold War alliance Query - not a Trump fan, but why do you have to start the article with 'For all his faults.' The article is about NATO/Mulshine. The rest is irrelevant to that topic frankly, and just screams out a lack of objectivity, and for me, damages credibility.
WSJ News Exclusive | Putin Wants NATO to Back Off but Is Achieving ‘Exactly the Opposite,’ Says Alliance Chief“If his intention was to get less NATO close to his border, he has achieved exactly the opposite”: NATO’s chief said Putin’s actions since 2014 are why the alliance has rebuilt its forces in Europe China will be the winner if NATO and Russia go to war! Gravitas | WHO chief DrTedros's home-country Ethiopia has slammed him for compromising the global health body's credibility. palkisu tells you how the WHO chief faces accusations of cover-up & genocide in Ethiopia. TedrosTheTerrible,Director WHO Disturbing Facts He Is Not Actually A Medical Doctor He Is A Part Of A Brutal Regime TPLFTerroristGroup thousands died from treatable diseases b/c of his incompetence HealthMinister,he forcibly sterilized Amhara women
Out Of This World: 555.55-Carat Black Diamond Lands In DubaiSotheby’s calls the 555.55-carat black diamond — believed to have come from outer space — “The Enigma.” Can black diamonds be man made? Idk - generally curious - but it almost looks man made to me; especially if the shape has cultural significance. Otherwise, it’s more than an enigma, it’s more like a miracle. And now its gone HEX
Rare $ 7 million 'outer space' black diamond to be auctioned in DubaiDUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Auction house Sotheby’s Dubai has unveiled a diamond that’s literally from out of this world. Sotheby’s calls the 555.55-carat...
Out of this world: 555.55-carat black diamond lands in DubaiAuction house Sotheby's Dubai has unveiled a diamond that's literally from out of this world.\n\n Nope. Put it back. Send it back. Before the Dominion comes looking for it
a communique released by the heads of member states last year, which said an attack against one member in space will be considered an attack against all. The new policy from NATO goes further and defines its key roles in space, including coordinating allies' space capabilities to help NATO's deterrence and defense efforts in other operational domains: land, maritime, air and cyberspace. It includes a list of principles and tenets the alliance seeks to uphold in accordance with international law, including that the use of outer space for peaceful purposes is in the common interest of all nations and that no country can claim space as its own. Of note: NATO said it is not aiming to become "an autonomous space actor" with its own capabilities but will rather rely on member countries that voluntarily provide "space data, products, services or effects that could be required for the Alliance’s operations, missions, and other activities." What they're saying: NATO has yet to define what constitutes an attack, says Kaitlyn Johnson, a space policy expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. It's unclear how it would respond to forms of satellite warfare that temporarily disable or blind targets without permanently damaging them. "They're restating that there's a connection to Article 5 and Article 6, but reading that and interpreting it, we as the public don't know how serious this is, or where are these redlines," she said. "I think the alliance is intentionally being vague about this to leave its options open." Johnson added that NATO's commitment to rely on allies' space capabilities is notable, considering it was one of the first entities to deploy strategic satellites starting in the 1970s. The big picture: Militaries around the world have already become reliant on space-based technologies, and increased competition in space may pressure more countries to in order to dominate their enemies or deter attacks on their satellites or private industries. Go deeper: