The conservative-dominated Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a challenge to the consideration of race in college admissions, adding another blockbuster case to a term with abortion, guns, religion and COVID-19 already on the agenda.
Two members of that four-justice majority are gone from the court: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died in 2020, and Justice Anthony Kennedy retired in 2018. Last week, the justice's weighed in for the first time on President Joe Biden's vaccine policies, halting a rule requiring a vaccine or testing at large businesses while allowing a vaccine mandate for most of the nation's health care workers.
The Biden administration had urged the justices to stay away from the issue, writing in the Harvard case that the challenges"cannot justify that extraordinary step" of overruling the 2003 decision. Twenty-five years later, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor likewise invoked the Harvard plan in her opinion in the Michigan law school case.Students for Fair Admissions claims that Harvard imposes a"racial penalty" on Asian American applicants by systematically scoring them lower in some categories than other applicants and awarding"massive preferences" to Black and Hispanic applicants.
Harvard's freshman class is roughly one-quarter Asian American, 16% Black and 13% Hispanic, Harvard says on its website."If Harvard were to abandon race-conscious admissions, African-American and Hispanic representation would decline by nearly half," the school told the court in urging it to stay out of the case.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Justices to hear challenge to race in college admissionsThe Supreme Court will hear lawsuits claiming that Harvard and the University of North Carolina discriminate against Asian American applicants. A decision against the schools could mean the end of affirmative action in college admissions. Incorrect it will mean an end to bias Affirmative Action is a counterintuitive measure. It takes opportunity away from people who have worked hard to even be considered by the institution. Consider applicants on many aspects of their achievements and role in the community. Finally...asians/latinos and NAs all face more discrimination and racism than black people...cam we start admitting this
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court to hear challenge to Harvard, UNC race admission policyThe Supreme Court announced Monday that it will take up a case challenging Harvard University and the University of North Carolina’s consideration of race in their admissions processes. Funny how the people that always cry about free enterprise have NO issue with a group suing to force a private institution to change admission criteria so their race can have an advantage. That's basically affirmative action in a nutshell 🤣 Sotomayor is so far out of touch with reality I can’t believe she’s in one of those seats smh
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court agrees to hear challenges to affirmative action in college admissionsBREAKING: The Supreme Court will consider challenges to affirmative action at Harvard College and another university. Another brick in the dam futilely holding back racist white supremacy in AmeriKKKa is attacked by partisan white supremacist Supreme Court hacks. 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 I know we all probably must have heard about Bitcoin but don't know how it works, I tried it in a week ago by a man who recommended me to Michael90078 on Twitter She guides me through and i made a return of R15500 after a week of trading, connect with her What kinda of Supreme Court is this! Why are they agreeing to hear all of these cases that have long precedents!? What the hell is going on here!? This is BS!!! The Supreme Court has been turned into a complete joke! 😆🤣😆😂😂😂😂😆🤣😆😂
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »
NPR Cookie Consent and Choices'The man behind this suit and others like it is Edward Blum—a conservative legal movement unto himself . . . . Blum also spearheaded attacks against the Voting Rights Act, culminating in the court's 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder . . . .' Edward Blum apparently sucks. Are they challenging Legacy admissions too? It looks like all this nonsense we faced for decades is coming to an end, 6-3 for the constitution! A win for those affected by it!
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court takes cases on future of affirmative actionJUST IN: The U.S. Supreme Court says it will take up a pair of cases that could decide the future of affirmative action in college admissions. Today SCOTUS put private affirmative action on the block, just as it did protection of voting rights for blacks in the South. Shamelessly. The Supreme Court isn’t wasting time overturning established law. Ugh! And you ask yourself what good is Clarence Thompson to colored pple really - it would seem he agrees with every bad thing meted out to blacks.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »