In 2018, Missouri voters approved a state-level redistricting plan for an appointed demographer to create maps emphasizing competitiveness and partisan fairness. But a new ballot measure added by the GOP-controlled state legislature aims to undo it.
A first of its kind in the nation redistricting system is being second-guessed on this year's ballot in Missouri and may be replaced with a second unprecedented system.
which gives an appointed demographer much of the power over state legislative redistricting. The plan includes requirements for the demographer to create maps emphasizing competitiveness and partisan fairness. And while commissions can overrule the demographer, 7/10ths of the members need to agree on an alternative. Since Republicans and Democrats in Missouri have very different views of what constitutes advantageous redistricting, that scenario isn't particularly likely.
Supporters of the Clean Missouri system, like Democratic state Rep. Doug Beck, believe it will create a more responsive legislature that will think differently on things like health care and education policy."When you have competitive elections, I think you have better-elected people," Beck says."I think you have better discussions. When you have a district that's 85% Democratic, what kind of elections are you having? And what kind of debate are you having on ideas?"
But backers of Amendment 3 say that Clean Missouri isn't about fairness or competitiveness, but about giving Democrats a leg up in the state legislative redistricting process. While some prominent Republicans like former U.S. Sen. John Danforth supported Clean Missouri, many of the state's political figures have strenuously opposed it and are seeking to repeal it before redistricting starts next year.
Lawmakers, many wearing masks, sit at their desks inside the House chamber Monday, April 27, 2020, in Jefferson City, Mo.Jeff Roberson/APtoggle captionJeff Roberson/APLawmakers, many wearing masks, sit at their desks inside the House chamber Monday, April 27, 2020, in Jefferson City, Mo.
Jeff Roberson/APTheir complaints about the 2018 system are many. For one thing, they contend the Clean Missouri ballot item was inherently deceptive because it paired redistricting changes and other items like lobbyist gift curtailments in one vote. Clean Missouri proponents pushed back by saying the redistricting overhaul was discussed extensively
in local media outlets, detractors say the marketing focused heavily on what they derisively called"ballot candy.""Because who wouldn't want to ban lobbyist gifts? I would love to ban lobbyists," says Republican state Rep. Justin Hill."But you end up voting for one thing, it ends up being 40-something pages — and voila you get a process that's supposedly 'nonpartisan.'"
Others say the only way to allow a demographer to produce a more competitive legislative landscape is to draw unwieldy, narrow districts that piece together Democratic-leaning urban areas with more Republican terrain.Lowell Pearson, who was part of a legal team that sued over Clean Missouri in 2018, predicts that will have negative consequences for lawmakers elected under the system.
"I worry that if we have these ribbon districts, we're going to have people in the Missouri House, particularly, but the Senate as well, who don't have knowledge of most of their constituents' lives," says Pearson,"and don't really understand how their constituents would have them vote on bills."
The new plan and its pushbackThe plan the legislature put on the ballot for November would abolish the demographer process put forth in Clean Missouri and instead allow either commissions or appellate judges to draw House and Senate lines. The Missouri Supreme Court would be
empowered to make changesif any final plan runs afoul of the system's criteria. Also, competitiveness and partisan fairness are deprioritized and substantially changed under Amendment 3, and approaches such as compactness are emphasized.The House and Senate commissions would get larger under the proposed legislative plan but still require 7/10ths of its members to vote to approve a map. That could mean if Amendment 3 passes next month, judges could get the final say over what House and Senate maps look like in 2021 when redistricting is due to take place.
The judgeswho participated in the 2011 processwrote a memo earlier this year detailing how they didn't use political affiliation data when drawing districts.Amendment 3 critics, though, say that judges have little expertise in redistricting — as evidenced by a 2011 Senate map that was struck down for being unconstitutional. And because the criteria under Amendment 3 is much different than Clean Missouri, the end result could be maps without a lot of competition.
Democratic lawmakers are also raising alarm bells about language in the proposed amendment that counts eligible voters, as opposed to total population for redistricting. Meaning, children and non-citizens could be left out of the numbers."To go from total population to only voters ... undoes 231 years of the way it has always been done in the United States of America," says state Rep. Jon Carpenter."This is a radical and fundamental change to the democratic process in this country."
While it's not required that mapmakers use the total population standard, Amendment 3 foes say it shouldn't even be an option.Voters aren't going to like the fine print, says Sean Soendker Nicholson, the Democratic political consultant who worked on Clean Missouri."What they've put forward in the form of Amendment 3 is a rather audacious effort to not only undo all of the reforms that voters passed but to create a redistricting system that's unlike anything that Missouri has ever seen," Nicholson says."It's unlike anything in the United States in a couple of key respects."
Amendment 3 foes are also honing in on the idea that lawmakers are trying to undo the will of the voters from two years ago."It's shameful. It's a disgrace," says Democratic state Rep. LaDonna Appelbaum."We should be working on a bipartisan plan to help Missourians, not take their will away."
Some Black political figures opposed Clean Missouri in 2018because they said the language wouldn't prevent a scenario where the percentage of Black residents in House and Senate districts get reduced — making it easier for white candidates to win. But many Black elected officials oppose the 2020 plan, including state Rep. Kevin Windham Jr.
"Even when they had the opportunity to engage with Black legislators, that obviously wasn't a priority," Windham says.The expensive fightThe campaign against the legislature's redistricting plan has been successful at collecting six-figure checks from labor unions and Democratic-leaning nonprofit groups. That includes $500,000 from the National Education Association and $1 million for the North Fund, a Democratic-leaning political nonprofit that doesn't have to disclose its donors.
The"no" on Amendment 3 campaign also received $250,000 from the National Redistricting Action Fund. That group, which is headed up by former Attorney General Eric Holder, seeks to enhance Democratic redistricting efforts across the country.Nicholson says the North Fund shares"our commitment to the values of fair redistricting that puts voters first."
"We've been working for literally years now to build a big coalition for a redistricting system that's fair to voters and that makes sure that voters have a functional choice in who represents them," Nicholson says."We raised money because campaigns are expensive. The campaign has received support from a lot of organizations."
And there's a reason for those Clean Missouri proponents to be vigilant:A summary of the initiative that voters will see on their ballotsdetails those marginal changes to limits on campaign donations and lobbyist gifts before mentioning the redistricting overhaul. Opponents of the new redistricting plan fear Missourians will think they're voting on an ethics overhaul, as opposed to mapmaking changes. That's likely one of the reasons why they're running ads showcasing how
the changes to lobbyist gift limits would be ineffectual.In addition to pointing out the deficiencies of the legislature's plan, Nicholson says his group is making the case that Clean Missouri is a better way of approaching the highly contentious redistricting process.
"This is a better way that makes sure that there is more competition, that protects against trying to do bad things in the future," Nicholson says. Read more: NPR »
'A slap in the face': Families of COVID-19 victims slam president's downplaying of his diagnosis
Families of victims killed by the coronavirus decried the president's latest tweet downplaying the pandemic, which has killed over 210,000 Americans.
carreras_fr Wake up Missouri and start calling representatives. Get loud! Open this tweet and read what is going on in your state!!! Since the Civil Rights era Republican have become the anti-civil rights party. They promote guns. Because the way they treat people, they need them. GOP motto: we can't win if we don't cheat.
Shocking. The GOP knows the only way they can win is to rig the election through gerrymandering. It would be nice if they had principles and policies that people would support. The best they can do is rig elections and create voter suppression. That is a sad day when that’s all The GOP has Anyone attempting to draw unfair maps needs to be driven away from governance. The public wants fair districts; they voted on it. The GOP doesn't care about fair districting and will rush or bully any tactic they can to suppress the votes of citizens. They'll do anything to cheat
Leave it to the GOP to undo anything meant to better lives. Defeat this ballot measure Missouri!!! Cool. Now do Illinois....it’s a one party state because of Democrat corruption Missourians time and again approve more liberal-leaning propositions and then elect people who don’t have the same beliefs who then try to undo what was already approved by voters 🤦🏼♀️
There was a demographer (woman I think) a year or so back who came up with a formula that didn't tell you where to draw the lines, but pointed out the flaws in plans for fairness. I saved it, then lost it. Damn. Anyone have that? Republicans love to subvert the will of the voters. Of course they do 🤦♂️
NoOn3 The GOP is the party of voter suppression
Parenting, Baby Names, Celebrities, and Royal News | CafeMom.com
What If Women’s Suffrage Never Happened?We took a hard look at voter data and found out the true impact women have on who gets to sit in the Oval Office. The results will surprise you.
Mail-in Ballot printer in Ohio took down its Trump 2020 Flag as delays increaseCleveland-based Midwest Direct has been criticized for not getting tens of thousands of ballots to voters in Ohio and Pennsylvania on time. Too late. JohnAvlon Unbelievable but not! Flying a trump flag? Didn't get the ballots out? After we've taken back our Federal government we need to come for the States
We’re in a third Covid spike. Chris Hayes says, ‘There are no more excuses.’“Now, here we are, we're going into the third spike, and there is nothing left to say—other than the president and the Republican Party, supporting him, are willfully getting people killed,” Chrislhayes says, discussing the coronavirus pandemic. chrislhayes Millions of Americans might die from hungry and depression if they do not receive a substantial amount of Corvid-19 relief soon. chrislhayes BlameTrump chrislhayes Dumbasses doing what they do i guess 🤣
Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer faces new battle over gun ban which Republicans say intimidates their voters'The right to vote and the right to keep and bear arms are not mutually exclusive. No voter should be forced to choose between these fundamental principles,' State Rep. Beau LaFave said. Not sure if Michigan has a open carry law. If it does, this could be illegal. I’m more concerned with her hypocrisy. This is one of the dumbest things I’ve heard all day. These people can definitely leave their gun at home and go to vote.
Prepared Patriotic Voter Says Her Viral TikTok was Hot Tip for SeniorsThe patriotic and prepared voter who went viral for her TikTok says her video was a PSA for seniors. Her daughter’s voice is so deep tho! With the constant movement in the value of Bitcoin, there is 10 times increase upon every investment made under the period of inbalance. What this means is that you can make as much as $10000 in a week with as low as $1000. Too Good to be True Right?.send a Dm for more info.