How the Trump Impeachment Trial Rules Compare to Clinton's Trial

  • 📰 YahooNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 40 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 59%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Trump notably blocked at least 12 potential witnesses from testifying in the House’s impeachment inquiry

The trial kicked off with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell revising two proposed rules for the proceedings, after he came under criticism for repeatedly claiming the trial rules would follow a precedent set by President Bill Clinton’s impeachment, but released a resolution that did not necessarily hew to those standards.

McConnell’s initial resolution, released Monday, allowed the Democratic House managers 24 hours to argue their case across two session days. The side representing Trump would also have up to 24 hours over two session days to make their arguments. Story continuesLead House impeachment manager Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff argued Tuesday that McConnell’s rules do not go far enough to ensure a fair trial. The resolution does not include a guarantee for new witnesses and documents to be presented in the trial, despite calls from Democrats to ensure that such evidence be seen.

However, during impeachment proceedings against Clinton in the House of Representatives, Republicans had access to testimony from other interviews collected by then-special counsel Ken Starr.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

READ ALL ABOUT IT !! READ ALL ABOUT IT !! TreasonousDemocrats attempt Coup in this Republic for 1st time in US history as in a 3rd world sh** hole. LiberalHackMedia are accomplices !! There YahooNews fixed it for you !

Yeah and the Democrats wouldn’t call the whistleblower as a witness.🤔

Democrats could have gone to court to bring in the witnesses they wanted in the house. But no democrats were in a hurry & knew the courts would go well into 2020 to approve the witnesses! Now democrats want the senate to do what the house should have done.

Why didn't democrats go to court and compel them to testify or did democrats have pre planned schedule to maintain?

It’s not foreign aid. It’s a money-laundering scheme. Send US money abroad Launder it Pay yourself and your kids back in US.

Should’ve subpoenaed them.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 380. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Trump impeachment trial: What to expect as the Senate trial resumesOne contentious issue will be whether to call witnesses. Democrats want to call John Bolton and others. But some GOP senators say that's unnecessary.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Fact check: How McConnell's impeachment trial rules differ from those that governed the Clinton trialSenate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell argued Tuesday that the rules he is proposing for President Donald Trump's Senate impeachment trial 'closely' follow past precedent, and invoked the 1999 trial of President Bill Clinton in particular. Republican Senators DISMISS this partisan fake impeachment nonsense! Biggest difference......it’s a sham and every American with half a brain knows it.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Senate adopts rules for Trump impeachment trial following marathon session, 11 defeated amendmentsEach of the 11 amendments offered by Senate Democrats, which included measures subpoenaing a variety of entities and officials – including the White House and John Bolton – were defeated by the Republican-held Senate What is good for the goose is good for the gander, tough luck dems. Just like the republicans were defeated in the house. Big surprise.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Senate Passes Trump Impeachment Trial Rules Proposed by McConnellPresident Trump’s legal team clashed with Democrats over their allegations of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, with senators ultimately approving rules for the third presidential impeachment trial in U.S. history. Oh look politicians can work late like the rest of us. Then they're going TV and brag about it 👌 Now let's get this thing over with and acquit President Trump. circus
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Jeremy Bash: Will Republicans allow a real Trump impeachment trial?Jeremy Bash reacts to day one of the impeachment trial: 'If there are merely opening statements and then there is a motion to not have witnesses ... and then they have a motion to dismiss, then in effect, the opening statements are the closing statements.' What happened to moral courage from Romney Collins ? Yuck. Not a 1 could squeak out approval— even on John Bolton? So I give up on the 4 or 5 so-called sane moderates. Not really. All cowards scared of Trump that they’ll lose their seats over it. Good. They should. I’m furious! We know what will happen. PROTEST NOW! One million in the capital NOW! We can’t let this happen without a response. I hope anyone on the fence is paying attention. If they are, they will be very upset that every single amendment proposed by the house team was shut down. This is not a good look. It is not the vision of America my family members gave their life for, fighting for Democracy.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Bitter exchanges and incriminating evidence rock Trump impeachment trialPresident Donald Trump's Senate impeachment trial, if its first real day is any guide, will be a dramatic, divisive and fact-bending showdown in his own confrontational image and its aftershocks will rumble for decades to come. StCollinson Are you nuts? this whole ImpeachmentScam is just a power grab by the Democrats because they can't win an election. StCollinson Yea, I can imagine what the GOP was thinking... StCollinson Incriminating evidence? That's a good one🤣🤣🤣
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »